Tyler Green
Art-focused Journalism by Tyler Green

Tyler Green Modern Art Notes

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Spotlight on conservation

I’m in Albuquerque to give one of several keynote talks at the annual meeting of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. (If you’re like me — or Blake Gopnik — and if you prefer art itself to shopping for it or building shopping lists, don’t miss the AIC’s 2012 abstract book. Some fascinating teases about Gauguin, Diebenkorn, Still, public art wiki-projects, modernist photography and more.)

To celebrate the fascinating and valuable work AICers do, here are links to two recent bits I’ve done about conservation:

The other books on Robert Irwin

If you’re an art lover — and especially if you’re an artist — you’ve probably read Lawrence Weschler’s great book-length profile of Robert Irwin, “Seeing Is Forgetting the Name of the Thing One Sees.” The book — either the original version or the updated 2009 version linked to above — has been in almost every artist’s studio I’ve been in. I can’t think of a single living artist who’s as closely identified with a single book and a single author. (So much so that on this week’s Modern Art Notes Podcast I asked Irwin if he’s comfortable with how one book and author have so dominated the presentation of his career. Links below.)

There are two other Irwin books that are almost as must-own: “Notes Toward a Conditional Art,” published last year by Getty Publications and “Robert Irwin: Primaries and Secondaries,” published by MCASD in 2008. Remarkably, there aren’t a ton of other Irwin books — he’s probably the least-published major artist of our time. (There must be 200 books on Gerhard Richter. There might not be 15 on Irwin.)

“Notes Toward a Conditional Art” is 332 pages of Irwin essays, interviews and documents from 1964 to the late 1990s. The project, edited by Matthew Simms, had its beginnings in the Robert Irwin papers, which are in the collection of the Getty Research Institute. A third of the essays are previously unpublished manuscripts. Included is a 62-page excerpt from Irwin’s famed oral history with painter Frederick Wight, papers from Irwin’s Miami International Airport proposal and documents related to Irwin’s participation in the LACMA Art & Technology program. There are even reproductions of pages from Irwin’s mid-1970s notebooks, the very notebooks about philosophy that he discussed on this week’s MAN Podcast.

The other must-own book is “Primaries and Secondaries,” the catalogue for the 2007 MCASD Irwin semi-retrospective. MCASD owns (much) more Irwin than any art museum or person, 75 in all. The museum owns significant work from pretty much every part of Irwin’s career, from a 1956 painting to late scrim and fluorescent pieces. The catalogue includes those works and features essays and notes on the new directions toward object-making Irwin began to explore in the mid-2000s. Thanks in part to the abundant pictures of Irwin’s work, I probably refer more often to this book for things Irwin-related than to Weschler’s.

Robert Irwin on The Modern Art Notes Podcast: Download the program, subscribe via iTunes, subscribe via RSS and/or view images of art discussed on the show.

MAN Podcast + Martha Rosler, live in Baltimore

Coming up tomorrow night!: Please join Martha Rosler and me at the Baltimore Museum of Art on May 2 for the first-ever live-audience recording of The MAN Podcast. The taping is part of the Open Walls Baltimore festival. Rosler and I will tape her upcoming appearance on The MAN Podcast at 7:30 pm. The program will be published via the program’s usual distribution points on Thursday, May 10 (iTunes, RSS, MAN, MANPodcast.com). Tickets will be free, but are first-come-first-served.

Over the last three decades, few American artists have been as sociopolitically engaged as Martha Rosler. Her work is especially concerned with challenging traditional gender roles, class dynamics, the media, war, violence and consumer-driven capitalism. Her importance as a pioneer of feminist and conceptual art is evident in “State of Mind: New California Art Circa 1970,” on view now at the Berkeley Art Museum. Rosler will receive her first solo show at the Museum of Modern Art this fall when her Meta-Monumental Garage Sale takes over MoMA’s atrium for 13 days at the end of November.

Also: If you don’t subscribe to Rosler’s Facebook updates, you’re missing not only the best Facebook page in the art world, but a site that could almost be considered the daily continuation of Rosler’s If It’s Too Bad To Be True, It Could Be DISINFORMATION (1985).

Image in the banner: Rosler, The Gray Drape (detail), 2008. Collection of the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Washington.

The ultimate-ish web guide to Cory Arcangel

This week’s Modern Art Notes Podcast features artist-trickster and Buffalo native Cory Arcangel. He was a really great guest and shared thoughts on how Buffaloans Paul Sharits, Tony Conrad and Allan D’Arcangelo continue to influence him, on his flare for digital pluck, failure as a happy outcome, whether he consciously thinks about art historical sources as he migrates concepts and ideas to new media and lots more. Just judging from the email the program has generated since it first ‘aired’ on Thursday, lots of listeners really dig this program, which is great. [Image: Arcangel, MIG 29 Soviet Fighter Plane and Clouds, 2005. Collection of Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo.]

There aren’t a lot of artists who have as many web tentacles as Arcangel does. Here’s my handy guide to what Arcangel does or has done online that’s particularly worth a look — and often a chuckle. (Readers are encouraged to add to this list in the comments!)

Visiting Andrea Zittel at A-Z West

In 2005 I visited Andrea Zittel, this week’s Modern Art Notes Podcast guest, at A-Z West in order to write a magazine story about her. This is that story. [Download the program, subscribe via iTunes, subscribe via RSSand/or view images of art discussed on the show. Image: The road to A-Z West via Magasin 3, Stockholm.]
Out of Los Angeles on Interstate 10, through two hours of inner-city, suburbs, exurbs, and past an Indian casino, beyond the turn-off for Palm Springs, past wind-power-generating turbines twirling in the wind, past a curiously punctuated sign that says “Buds Tires,” past the convenience store where you can buy a poker-chip money clip for $5.95 and a “Support Our Troops” yellow ribbon magnet for a dollar less. Then up Highway 62—a four-lane highway on which SUVs go 70 mph in the left lane and ATVs go 15 mph in the right; past a mobile home that has blown across the desert and come to a stop up against the raised road; through Morogno Valley, where a radio ad explains how to use a pawn shop; past the “Dig Your Own Cactus 39 Cents” store; and finally to a steep, rocky hillside across the highway from a strip mall which features the county heath department, a cardiologist, and a bail bondsman.

I’m here.

Here is about three hours east of L.A., and four hours west of Phoenix—in the middle of the Mojave Desert, in Joshua Tree, California.

Here is A-Z West, the 30-acre desert headquarters of Andrea Zittel, one of the hottest artists in America. A-Z West is what Zittel calls what she does, and where she does it. Her home is here, along with her studio and a desert open-air display-space, a kind of cross between an RV park and a sculpture garden. With the first major Zittel survey exhibition working its way from Houston to New York, Buffalo, Los Angeles, and Vancouver, BC, A-Z West has become a must-see stop on the contemporary art circuit. Barely five years old, it has worked its way up toward earth art monuments such as Robert Smithson’s Spiral Jetty in Utah’s Great Salt Lake, and Walter De Maria’s Lightning Field in Quemado, New Mexico. The difference between those installations and A-Z West is that Zittel lives here and her decision to do so is as much a part of her art is the work on her property.

As an artist, Zittel is equal parts sculptor, architect, designer, developer, and performer. She works with fabricators, welders, and such to produce objects like the ones I see around me. A-Z Wagon Stations, for example, are 15 pastry-case-sized aluminum hutches mounted on poles about three feet off the ground. When Zittel’s friends visit A-Z West, they can sleep in their own, personalized A-Z Wagon Station. Like much of Zittel’s art, the A-Z Wagon Stations are functional sculptures that address a range of contemporary issues such as how we use land, how we live, and what constitutes an art object.

To my left as I drive up the hill between the highway and Zittel’s home is a beat-up white van, parked—or randomly abandoned—on a patch of desert. It obviously doesn’t belong there, but then again what here does? Just as the pebbly dust of the road turns to sofa-sized pink granite boulders I park and walk the last hundred feet up to A-Z West. There’s a note on the door: Zittel is having lunch a little way down the highway and she’ll be back in a few minutes.

I find a hunk of rock on which to sit down and look. In the middle of A-Z West is Zittel’s home, a white cabin tucked into the middle of the hill, and about the size of three Hummers parked next to each other. The only tree I can see on the hill—and one of only two trees I can see in what must be a 200-square-mile panorama—is planted right in front of the house. I recognize a lot of the stuff strewn around Zittel’s acreage: A-Z Wagon Stations, an A-Z Work Station, an A-Z Travel Trailer Customized by Miriam and Gordon Zittel, an A-Z Homestead Unit, an A-Z Yard Yacht, and The Regenerating Field. I’m only slightly disappointed not to see Zittel’s most humorous product, A-Z Thundering Prairie Dogs, in the desert. (Of course, prairie dogs live on prairies, not in deserts, I think.)

And why the A-Z Everything? Zittel gave herself a brand name because when she called industrial suppliers, no one took seriously a high-pitch-voiced girl named Andrea. When she told them that she was calling on behalf of A-Z West, they assumed she was legit. A-Z West has even joined the Joshua Tree Chamber of Commerce.

Zittel drives up in her Subaru. She is tall, skinny, and is wearing an A-Z Fiber Form Uniform (Fall) made out of grayish-brown merino wool. She has big eyes, straight blonde hair, and a jaw line that seems made for life in a windy desert. She welcomes me into the cabin as if we’ve known each other for years. “I wanted a house without other homes around it,” Zittel says, as we enter her living room.

“How’d you find this one?”

“It took a few trips,” she says. “It’s an original homestead cabin from the 1930s. There’s nothing more fun than driving around looking for cabins in the desert.”

We stared out at the desert a bit. The valley floor is cut into a grid by a series of dirt roads. Like her cabin, the grid dates from the 1930s, when the federal government passed the Small Tract Act—better-known locally as the Baby Homestead Act—to give a five-acre parcel of land to anyone willing to ‘improve’ the land by building on it. Most people couldn’t make a life in the desert and left. In recent years many of the abandoned cabins I see below have been used as methamphetamine labs.

Zittel told me the names of some of the dirt roads. Then she sees the white van parked on or around the northern edge of her property. “I wonder what that is,” she says. “It’s a strange place to be parked.”

It is, perhaps, a strange place to live, situated ten miles from Yucca Valley, a town that seems to consist mostly of fast-food joints and big-box stores. Fifteen miles in the other direction you come to Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, more commonly known as Twentynine Palms. It’s where Marines go to get better at blowing things up. Explosions from the Marine base occasionally rock Zittel’s cabin. (You know you’ve left Joshua Tree and entered Twentynine Palms when you see a large, inexplicable billboard advertising breast implants.) And while Zittel has electricity, she has to have water trucked in once a month, more often in the summer.

None of the desert’s hardships have deterred Zittel’s admirers, for whom driving out here has become a popular excursion. About 250 people visit A-Z West each year. “A while back a couple of artists, kids, from Oregon just showed up,” Zittel said. “They bought a car in Portland for $1,200 and wanted to see how far they could get before the car died. They ended up at A-Z West, so I showed them around. Near the end of the day I asked them where they were staying. They looked at each other and kind of grinned. ‘Uh, can we spend the night?’”

Most of the visitors turn up for A-Z West’s annual High Desert Test Sites weekend, when artists from around America come to put up art installations on Zittel’s property. Last year one artist made a sauna that was activated by the desert’s dramatic nighttime temperature drop. Most of the works are temporary, but a few have a longer life. A broken Leo Villareal light sculpture made out of white LEDs was broken when I visited, desert art-trash. Zittel often ends up maintaining HDTS installations for months after the artists have departed.

Life and art are inseparable. Versions of the A-Z Fiber Form Uniform Zittel is wearing are in museum collections in the United States and Europe. Virtually everything on Zittel’s property and in her cabin is a work of art.

“Yeah, sometimes I worry about going too far and making my child the A-Z Baby,” she says. “I realized that the whole point of making work in the context in which it’s created was to make it more real. But when your work-life is not separated from your art and from your daily life, it makes it hard for life to seem real.”

She pauses and points down toward the abandoned cabins and back toward the big-box stores in Yucca Valley. “Seriously, it’s important for me to be out here in the desert, inhabiting it and experiencing it, and trying to interpret it some way. The desert is changing and we can’t be in denial about that anymore. It’s not the raw, open west. It’s the frontier, and the frontier is being colonized.”

We had been walking, and were now close to the white van. We stared at it, unsure if we wanted to provoke it, or whomever might be inside.

Before arriving at A-Z West I thought that some of Zittel’s work was a little kitschy, a cute idea that flirted with becoming an anti-McMansion polemic. After walking around A-Z West with Zittel, I see I was wrong. Land use, lifestyle, and the intersection of art and design are all prominent contemporary issues. In the post-war era Americans have excelled at proclaiming a love for the land – particularly Western land — while subdividing it into oblivion. Zittel’s work and life challenge the way we ‘improve’ the West.

“I foresee A-Z becoming an entity of some sort, and I want it to be acquired by a foundation that would turn it into something,” Zittel says. Suddenly Zittel’s dog ran right up to the van and started sniffing. We braced ourselves for a methed-up, bearded man to come jumping out of the driver’s side door. Instead: nothing.

Zittel’s dog came bounding back.

“I guess it’s just parked there,” Zittel said. We both shrugged and walked back up toward the house.

Sports on exhibit (and on TV)

It’s been a pretty good season for artist Catherine Opie: An exhibition of her football pictures and portraits just closed at Chelsea’s Mitchell, Innes & Nash and Opie is featured in art21’s new season, its sixth. The show features Opie’s pictures of swimming legend Diana Nyad.

The other reason I’ve been thinking about Opie’s work of late is that it’s not in curator David Little’s “The Sports Show” at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts. That’s fine — you can’t have every artist doing sports or athletes in every show that looks at art about sports. But thinking about that got me thinking about the 2010 Wexner Center for the Arts exhibition “Hard Targets,” which Opie was in, and how wildly different that show is from “The Sports Show.” [Image: Opie, Josh, 2007, from "Hard Targets."]

Here’s MAN’s look at “Hard Targets”:

Thea beast Google doodle eaver

Today’s Google doodle is the best ever. Click here to go to the Google home page, then be sure to click on the ‘play’ arrow.

Shared without comment. (Mostly.)

“MFA in Vegas, Baby. These spirited entertainers, seen here with MFA Director Malcolm Rogers at the opening of the Art of the Americas wing, are a colorful reminder that 20 paintings by Claude Monet from the MFA, along with many works by Monet’s contemporaries, will be on view at the Bellagio Gallery of Fine Art in Las Vegas through January 2013. The MFA’s collection is so rich with Impressionist holdings that we are able to share these beautiful works of art with children and families in other cities who might never come to Boston, while always providing a sumptuous display of Impressionist art for visitors to our own galleries.”

The photograph and caption are from the MFA Boston’s Facebook page.

Related: My 2005 Boston Globe op-ed on the museum’s decision to rent out paintings in Las Vegas. In case that’s behind a paywall, I’ve also posted it in the jump.

(more…)

The Whitney Biennial: Unanswered questions

The Whitney Biennial opens this weekend. The show’s co-curator is Jay Sanders, a New York art dealer who left  Chelsea — at least for now — to help organize the show.

I have yet to read Whitney director Adam Weinberg address why he hired a dealer to co-organize his trademark show or answer any questions about it whatsoever. After naming Sanders, Weinberg apparently ducked his museum’s own press release (!) and he spent over a month putting off inquiries from MAN before a museum spokesperson said he wouldn’t discuss the decision — or even if the hire was Weinberg’s decision. So far as I know, Weinberg has yet to discuss the decision publicly. (Readers?)

In this post I detailed some of the questions that Weinberg should answer.

Looking back

I published a nearly identical version of this post on Feb. 14, 2007.

TLG2.jpgMy love of art comes from my mom. I know that’s not very specific, but it’s the best I can do. Mom painted watercolors. My grandmother’s house is full of them: Paintings of colorful, twisted trees on the California coast and brushy abstractions of the cats next door, especially the fat one, Big Bertha. But the paintings I like best are mom’s Sierra Nevada landscapes.

I don’t remember seeing Mom paint. That’s not to say that she only painted in the absence of us kids, or when my father wasn’t around. It’s just that I remember the family experiences that surrounded her painting instead.

This is especially true of the paintings she made in the Sierras. Each year we took a family vacation to Silver Lake, a quiet mountain retreat undiscovered by people who need second homes. From there we took near-daily eight- or ten-mile hikes. For a boy who spent 50 weeks a year in a comfy San Francisco suburb, hikes past a mountain of shale called Elephant’s Back into backcountry named the “Desolation Wilderness” was roughing it. Sometimes we even saw marmots. I loved it.

Mom liked something simpler: the light. Mom didn’t paint traditional mountainscapes. She liked to take a short walk from our cabin to a puddle surrounded by vast sheets of granite. We generously called it Granite Lake. Mom painted it so much that dad nicknamed her ‘Janet Granite.’

I didn’t know it at the time, but my mother was hardly the first person to fall in love with the Sierra’s exposed granite. John Muir, who thought of the Sierra as a father thinks of a son, called the high country the “Range of Light.” Muir wasn’t speaking metaphysically: The granite that covers much of the surface of this part of the Sierra Nevada is shockingly white. Sierra granite is inlaid with xenoliths, highly-reflective crystals that magnify and bounce light back up into the ionosphere. The result is a blinding brightness that emanates not from above, but from the ground.

That white is in most of mom’s Sierra landscapes. The paintings are straightforward compositions with straightforward mountain colors. Water is a pale blue. Trees are a deep green. Dead trees, one of her favorite things to paint, are twenty tones of crisp grey. One of the striking elements of  mom’s watercolors is how she played with that Sierra-granite white. She must have noticed that watercolor paper hints at both the texture and the brightness of Sierra granite because her best Sierra watercolors are spare, empty and feature big unpainted areas. Sometimes she heightened those effects by using watery dabs of opaque black to suggest the lichen that grows on granite, or to reference the shiny black chunks of xenolith in the rock.
GraniteLake.jpg

This is all hindsight. When I was eight or nine, I thought Granite Lake was a big zero. No dramatic mountaintop rose behind it. The landscape was barren because trees could only rarely put roots down into granite. Joan Didion wrote something that I think of when I look at one of Mom’s granitescapes: Certain places seem to exist mostly because someone wrote about them. Didion was talking about Faulkner and Oxford, Mississippi, or Hemingway and Kilimanjaro. For me, Granite Lake exists only because Mom painted it.

Ultimately, I wish I remembered being around my mother when she was painting, but I don’t. Watercolors aren’t that exciting to a 10-year old kid, so when mom was painting I was off skipping stones or searching for summer snowpack from which I could start a snowball fight.

Instead, most of what I remember about mom and art has to do with what she did before and after painting. I remember going with her to Bowers, a Burlingame, Calif. art supply store that had narrow aisles and two big glass windows in front. The woman who ran the place (Mrs. Bowers?) was so nice that I was embarrassed to go into the store — I was too young to know how to be nice back.

I also remember driving to the nearby town of Belmont, where Mom took painting classes. Mom earned her master’s at Stanford and didn’t necessarily need art lessons in a suburban community center, but she probably liked being around other artists. While she painted I sat in the car, a 1979 VW camper bus with a pop-top, reading books about a boy detective named Encyclopedia Brown.

I don’t remember our family going to art museums — except for once. When I was about ten, my parents took me to a Juan Gris retrospective at the Berkley Art Museum. Actually, my mother went to the exhibit and, by virtue of me-too groupthink, the whole family tagged along. I was induced to participate through the promise of a trip to a family-friendly cheeseburgerie called Fat Albert’s. They made really good milkshakes.

I don’t know why I remember that day. I’m sure I’d been in a museum before — and that I didn’t really like them. On a family trip to Kansas City, mom had wanted to go to the Nelson-Atkins. “But Mom,” I had said. “We have museums at home. You can see paintings there!” The Fat Albert’s bribe was intended to prevent such outbursts.
JuanGriscover.jpg

But at the Gris show I looked at the art and asked Mom questions about it. I don’t remember if she answered them. I was impressed with the quiet authority of paintings hanging on a wall, and with the reverent way people responded to them. (How could all those people stand so still?) I passed the time trying to find objects — faces, guitars, cups — in Gris and feeling pretty proud of myself when I found them. Odd: I know I wanted to go to Fat Albert’s, and I’m pretty sure we went there after the museum, but all I remember now is Juan Gris.

Gris was one of my mother’s favorite artists. I don’t know why. Mom was no particular fan of Spanish art and she was no cubist. I’ve looked and I’ve looked, but there is no discernable Juan Gris influence in any of her watercolors.

For some reason Mom was adamant about buying the Gris catalog. I have no idea why, and I have even less of an idea why I remember that. But I do, perhaps because her insistence on buying the catalog made it clear that art mattered, that Gris’s art really mattered, and that paintings weren’t something you looked at and then forgot about. If you liked them, you stood still and looked at them for a long time. Then you bought a book about them and learned more.

For months I saw the Gris catalog everywhere around the house – in the kitchen, on our back porch where mom frequently painted, in our den. It had a black cover and Gris’ name on it in big, silver letters. There was also a Gris painting on the cover – a cubist composition of a blue guitar-table of some sort. Sometimes, when she wasn’t painting or doing mom things (Mawwwwm, I’m huuuuungry), I saw her pencil notes into the catalog.

I’ll never know why mom liked Juan Gris, what she thought about the Berkeley exhibit, or what she wrote in that catalog. Less than two years after that afternoon in Berkeley she was dead. Today is the twenty-fifth anniversary of her death.

Years later I sent family members searching through houses and basements in an effort to find that catalog. Why did Gris matter to my mom? Why did any artist matter to her? Why painting? Why watercolors? Why art?

It’s my own fault that we never found that Gris catalog. I didn’t realize that it was important to me until I was back in Missouri and in college, when I realized that I wanted to go to the Nelson-Atkins after all.