Tyler Green
Art-focused Journalism by Tyler Green

Tyler Green Modern Art Notes

Archive for the ‘Satire’ Category

In Boston, more fallout from the MFA’s $200 fee

In a surprise development, the Institute of Contemporary Art Boston announced that it will be free to the public for 24 hours starting at 7pm on Sept. 17.

The move is a direct response to the cross-town Museum of Fine Arts’ planned $200 charge to see the recent MFA acquisition The Clock, a 24-hour-long film installation by Christian Marclay. The MFA announced yesterday that it will charge admission on a sliding scale, starting at $200 for entry at 7pm on Sept. 17, ending at 7am on Sept. 18, when entry to the MFA will be free as part of a community day. As a result, non-$200-level visitors will have the opportunity to see only half of The Clock when the MFA debuts the work. Last night the MFA reminded people via its Twitter feed, which it does not charge readers to access, that the $200 fee also includes a party. “After all, the art is really secondary to the shindig,” the Twitter feed did not add.

“It’s going to be awesome,” MFA Boston curator Jen Mergel really did say about the $200-a-head party, honest to god, I am not making up this part, I swear it.

“As part of the free celebration of our own museum and our own program, we’ll be having a party too,” ICA director Jill Medvedow told MAN. “Furthermore, we’re pleased to announce that the MFA seems to have had a moment of realization about the optics of their $200 event and is sending to our event a cake. The MFA promises to deliver the cake on a late-18th-century French plate from the MFA’s collection. [Above.] I understand that the MFA will allow our visitors to see the plate free of charge. Also, MFA director Malcolm Rogers specifically requested that we let visitors eat the cake.”

Critics were quick to criticize the MFA event as reinforcing notions that art, particularly contemporary art, is little more than a luxury good meant to be enjoyed by the privileged few. They pointed out that the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, which also bought a copy of The Clock, has made the work available to the public via special screenings and that it has used the potentially populist piece as a way to build a connection with its community instead of as a reminder that art is first and best accessible to the privileged class.

“That’s just outrageous,” Rogers said via a statement that was printed on thick bond paper that smelled of rosewater. “That’s like saying the Bush tax cuts only benefited the wealthy. Once we’re done soaking the rich, the rest of Mr. Marclay’s artwork will trickle down to the little people, you know, the ones for whom we exhibited Chihuly. In fact, we’re so generous that we’re letting anyone see half of all our artworks for free on Sept. 18 starting at 7am. That way anyone who can’t afford $200 to see an entire artwork can at least see half of it.”

Rogers explained that the MFA”s new ‘half-viewing’ policy was directly inspired by the Marclay: Because Marclay requires that The Clock be shown in real time, visitors who want to see the 8pm part of the artwork have to be in the gallery at 8pm, which means they’d have to pay $200 to see it. Because visitors who enter the MFA after 7 am on Sept. 18th will be able to see only half the Marclay and because they won’t be paying anything, Rogers said the museum wanted to replicate the experience of seeing The Clock. That means that freeloaders visitors will be able to see only half of all other works the MFA has on view.

Informed that many museums charged much less than $200 for access to their collections and that many others were free, Rogers snorted. “Please, I’m running a business here,” he said. Informed that he is not, in fact, running a business but a non-profit institution that has as its mission to make its art accessible to “broader constituencies,” he replied: “That’s crazy talk. We even have inventory available for rent.” [Image: ICA Boston, via Flickr user Joevare.]

Medvedow also said that her museum was working with the MFA to present a series of Sept. 17 events for people who could not afford the $200 fee at the MFA. Prime among them will be the opening of the ICA Boston’s roof to visitors, access that Medvedow said was specially requested by Rogers himself. ”The MFA felt that many Bostonians might miss the metaphor it is presenting with its $200 charge, so in the spirit of institutional collegiality we asked what we could do to help,” Medvedow said. “Malcolm told me that the MFA could best get across the nuance of its $200 message by inviting people to dive from our roof into Boston Harbor. That seemed a little odd, but the MFA told me that this would be a good way of cooperatively promoting the ICA’s beautiful, waterfront location while at the same time allowing the MFA to tell average Bostonians to take a flying leap.”

Next up: Guggenheim Punxsutawney

Just when you thought it was safe to travel in second-tier democracies around the world, this morning the Guggenheim struck again. Helsinki, the capital and largest city of the top hockey nation in eastern Scandinavia, announced today that it has commissioned the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation “to conduct a concept and development study, exploring the possibility of creating a new Guggenheim Museum in Finland.”

“We loved the Guggenheim Guadalajara so much that we wanted one of our own,” Helsinki mayor Jussi Pajunen said today at a press conference.

Guggenheim Foundation and museum director Richard Armstrong, in Helsinki for the announcement, winced. Deputy mayor Tuula Haatainen whispered something in Pajunen’s ear.

Pajunen turned away from Haatainen and back to the crowd. “I apologize for the confusion about the Guggenheim Guadalajara. It turns out it was never built, that the project was canceled in 2009. Sometimes even the mighty Kiprusoff lets in a soft goal.”

The crowd murmured audibly, aware that the once mighty Miikka Kiprusoff has been letting in a lot of soft goals for the NHL’s Calgary Flames this year.

“Nevermind Guadalajara!” the mayor continued. “I loved the Frank Gehry-designed Guggenheim on the East River in lower Manhattan. I still love visiting the Guggenheim Las Vegas. The Jean Nouvel-designed Guggenheim Rio de Janeiro showed how timeless French-and-American cultural imperialism can be. We think that the Guggenheim Helsinki can do for Finland what Finland’s own Lauri Korpikoski has done for the National Hockey League.”

Deputy mayor Haatainen leaned forward again and whispered something in the mayor’s ear, presumably about how Korpikoski may have been chosen to much acclaim in the first round of the 2004 NHL draft, but that he hasn’t done squadoosh since.

Pajunen, red-faced, scrambled away from the microphone. Sensing it was his turn to speak, Armstrong stepped forward, looked up at the assembled throng of Finns and cleared his throat.

“Tom Krens is a handsome man,” he said. “This morning I woke up and thought to myself, ‘I look a lot like him.’ Also, I feel Finnish today because I remember Lauri Korpikoski! The Rangers drafted him in 2004, right? Come to think of it, whatever happened to him?”

Haatainen stood up, leaned into the microphone and explained to Armstrong and to the audience that Korpikoski never really panned out in New York and was now with Phoenix.

The assembled audience winced at the unintentionally apt metaphor, but secretly felt pride at how it merged one Finnish passion (hockey) with another (bumbled metaphors that can be ‘fixed’ when what the freakishly tall American says is translated into Finnish).

”We’re engaging an entire continent,” Krens Armstrong said. ”We live in a very international world. From the perspective of operating museums, all our contact is East-West. The North-South equation doesn’t exist. To ignore that is crazy. And you know what else is crazy? People keep believing us when we build all of these things!”

In a related story, digital art journalists around the world were delighted at the opportunity to publish the above photograph made available by the City of Helsinki.

Virginia AG Cuccinelli to turn sights on VMFA?

VirginiaSeal.jpgIn the wake of a decision by Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinelli to cover up the bare-breasted woman on the Virginia state seal, officials at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts in Richmond are concerned that Cuccinelli will next turn his attention to the museum and its collection. Cuccinelli’s interest in the state’s seal was first reported by Norfolk’s Virginian-Pilot newspaper. Cuccinelli is a right-wing Republican best known for questioning President Obama’s citizenship and for ending protections for gays and lesbians at Virginia universities.

The Virginian-Pilot reported on May 1 that Cuccinelli had modified the state’s seal — which was designed in 1776 by a four-man committee consisting of Richard Henry Lee, George Mason, George Wythe and Robert Carter Nicholas. The seal features a classical-inspired image intended as a clear departure from a British-style coat of arms. In a reference to the colonies’ separation from Great Britain, the seal shows a bare-breasted female figure, intended to signify virtue, standing victorious over a male figure meant to personify tyranny. According to the Virginian-Pilot, Cuccinelli recently distributed lapel pins to his staff that feature Virtus with her torso covered by a breastplate.

GentileschiVMFA.jpgThe timing is especially difficult for the VMFA, which re-opened last weekend after a $150 million expansion that makes it America’s 14th-largest art museum. The new VMFA has more gallery space than the Museum of Modern Art in New York, the Seattle Art Museum or the J. Paul Getty Museum. Its collections of French art deco, south Asian and African art are among the nation’s best. The VMFA also has particular strength in European painting, modern art, American art and in Faberge objects. The VMFA is effectively the state of Virginia’s art museum and describes itself as state-supported but privately endowed, a phrase that is believed to concern Cuccinelli.

Museum officials think that Cuccinelli may be outraged by numerous works in the museum’s  collection. “Certainly our first worry is how the attorney general will react to our Artemisia Gentileschi, Venus and Cupid (ca. 1625-30, above),” VMFA director Alex Nyerges said. “We held a meeting and decided our best bet was to call Hirshhorn director Richard Koshalek and to ask him to send some of his staff to Richmond. We understand they’re experienced at walking around a museum on request, so we’ll send them to to walk around the Gentileschi in the hopes of obscuring it from Cuccinelli’s view. We’re also having our staff study this turn-of-the-17th-century Italian suit of armor. As soon as possible, we’ll send our staff into our gift shop to draw breastplates onto posters of the Gentileschi. Same low price.”

HebeVMFA.jpgNyerges concedes that the VMFA collection is full of objects likely to outrage the attorney general. The VMFA has one of the best collections of English silver in the United States, including a 19th-century Hebe by Paul Storr (detail at right). Hebe was the Greek goddess of youth and is frequently portrayed with pert, bare breasts. The Virginia Hebe features breasts that aren’t only pert and bare, but that are also shiny. “Remember when Jimmy Carter said he had lust in his heart?” Nyerges said. “Well, nevermind that spiritual stuff. With Hebe you can actually see your lust reflected on her pert, bare breasts.”

Other works of concern to VMFA officials include Tom Wesselmann’s Great American Nude #35,  a George Segal sculpture, and a Greek female figure from ca. 2400 BC. “Normally we’d date the Greek figure to ca. 2400 BCE, before the common era,” Nyerges said. “However, we know that Cuccinelli is a Catholic conservative, so we’ve re-dated it to ca. 2400 BC, before Christ.”

PearlsteinVMFA.jpgWhile those works just include bare breasts, Nyerges said that he realizes that Philip Pearlstein’s Two Models Reclining on a Cast-Iron Bed will likely outrage Cuccinelli. “Cuccinelli has said that homosexuality is ‘intrinsically wrong,’ and that it is offensive to ‘natural law,’” Nyerges said. “In this work of art, an oil-on-canvas that Pearlstein may have been talking about when he described the human body as a ‘constellation of still-life forms,’ two women are sharing a bed. Our research shows that Cuccinelli also said that homosexual ‘acts’ are a detriment to our culture. Well, we’re not sure if sharing a bed is an ‘act’ or not.”

A museum official suggested that the museum’s best hope of avoiding a problem with the attorney general was an approach suggested by John Ravenal, VMFA’s curator of modern and contemporary art and the president of the Association of Art Museum Curators. Ravenal said that he thinks a Henry Moore in VMFA’s collection, Reclining Figure (Exterior Form) might actually be a work that the museum can use to reach out to Cuccinelli. “It’s a reclining female nude,” Ravenal said. “But that’s not as ‘bad’ as it sounds. Instead of breasts, it just has holes where the breasts would be. There’s nothing for him to want to cover up, just the absence of two entire body parts.”

Late Monday night Cuccinelli’s office announced that it was discontinuing use of the new, toned-down seal. “That’s great,” Nyerges said. “Now maybe we can show him the Gentileschi and explain to him the erotic symbolism of Venus’ left hand playing with that flimsy bit of sheer wrap.”

Only on MAN: Hirshhorn announces planned acquisitions

TheEmperor.jpgThis morning the Washington Post published this Hirshhorn press release announcing the museum’s plans to relocate its bookstore. Because the new bookstore will be designed by Los Angeles-based artist Doug Aitken, the Hirshhorn plans to pay for it with funds set aside for acquisitions.

This morning I acquired got my hands on a top-secret list of the Hirshhorn’s next planned collection additions. [Image: The Emperor. Also, his empress, who would seem to have the emperor's...]

As it turns out, a museum spokesperson was eager to explain its new acquisition plans: “When the trustees refused to donate money for some of our director’s plans, we decided that one way to make things happen was to involve an artist in anything and everything we do,” the spokesman said. “That way we can tap the Hirshhorn’s abundant acquisitions funds to pay for whatever. We also thought the trustees would be less likely to object so long as it wasn’t their money. Heck, they might even be out shopping when this comes up at a board meeting. Wouldn’t that be ironic! Actually, now that I think about it, here’s another idea: We’ll have Richard Prince in the room when they’re out shopping. That way the whole trustee meeting can be paid for via the acquisitions budget!”

Here’s the list of upcoming Hirshhorn acquisitions:

1.) New sinks in the Hirshhorn bathrooms: Robert Gober. The sinks may still come from Kohler, but they won’t have faucets. “We thought about having running water in the sinks,” said Hirshhorn director Ken Lay. “But Olafur Eliasson was too expensive. Also, that’ll make Gober’s drains a nice conceptual touch.”

2.) Conservation of the Doug Aitken bookstore: Tino Sehgal. Conservators will walk in circles around the museum’s Bunshaft-designed building, talking about both the bookstore and the “progress” the museum’s director is making in transforming the Hirshhorn.

3.) New light bulbs for Hirshhorn galleries: Dan Flavin. Upon being informed Flavin was no longer alive, Lay seemed confused. Then a, er, light bulb went off over his head: “Spencer Finch!”

4.) Stocking the Hirshhorn bookstore: Josephine Meckseper. “We realized that acquiring stock for the bookstore would be expensive,” Lay said. “So we’re going to acquire books, t-shirts, whatevs, and then have Meckseper sign the purchase invoice. That way it’ll be fund-able through the acquisitions budget, convenient, and a wry commentary on consumerism!”

(In a related story, the Hirshhorn said that it plans to announce that from now on its library will be a Rachel Whiteread that the museum already owns. “That way we won’t need any more expensive books,” Lay said.)

5.) Auditing of the Hirshhorn’s acquisition expenditures: Josiah McElheny. Asked to explain the sudden switch away from Smithsonian accountants, Lay said: “From now on we’re pretty much going to do this kind of thing with mirrors.”

A Tale of Titian and Philip

Usually Titian painted commissions for wealthy patrons. It comes as no surprise that this is how he came to paint Venus With a Mirror. But when Titian died, Venus With a Mirror was in his personal collection, apparently having been rejected by several patrons. Here, revealed for the first time, is the true story of how Titian came to keep Venus.

The year is 1555. Tiziano Vecellio is presenting a painting to his patron, Philip II of Spain. Phil sits silently as the artist, now better known as Titian, pulls a curtain away from the painting, revealing it for the first time. Philip nods, but expresses no other emotions.

“You don’t like it, P2?” Titian asks, using his pet name for Philip.

“Well, it’s, uh, it’s…”

“Say what you think, Phil, I can take it.” Titian began to look a little nervous.

“Well, er,” Philip was rising to a full blush and stammered on for a moment before looking down. “Her breast, Tizi, her right breast is, is, uh… pruriently exposed.”

Titian didn’t know what pruriently meant, but it sounded bad so he gasped. He didn’t quite understand… After all, breasts had been bared in art and performance for centuries. It never occurred to him that his patron would be such a prude about something so beautiful. But, of course, the last thing Titian wanted to do was offend his patron, so he searched his brain for an explanation.

“Oh, goodness!” Titian said, his eyes open wide for effect. “I’m so sorry! I hadn’t noticed! I was just painting, and painting, and, well… I think, I think the model had a wardrobe malfunction and I was so busy painting I just didn’t notice. ”

Philip looked at him with a raised eyebrow. Titian continued.

“My lord, I am most apologetic. I could hardly have known that Venus’ velvet robe would slip off of her torso. Obviously she didn’t either — she’s clearly trying to cover up.” Titian thought that last bit a rather good save.

Philip shook his head sternly and looked down at the artist. “It won’t do, Tizi. It simply will not do.”

Philip paused. He began to shake his head slowly, then with more vim, and finally his gesticulations became quite pronounced. Titian could see that Philip was either rising to anger or was providing a damn good facsimile thereof. “Tizi, Tizi, what will people think! If you walk around painting breasts — breasts, Tizi! — people will desire them! People will start dreaming of them! They’ll start copulating in the, in the, in the streets, Tizi! We can’t have commoners copulating in the streets!”

Titian thought about this. Given the amount of open sewage in the streets, this truly might not be a good thing. Still, it seemed to Titian that Philip ought to be more worried about raw sewage than about the representation of a beautiful breast on a piece of canvas.

“Golly Phil, I see what you mean. If people saw a breast and actually thought about copulating or anything like that, it could bring down the Spanish empire. I never thought of it that way.”

Philip nodded wisely. “Tizi, people will talk. I’m going to have to punish you. I think I’ll issue a stern statement proclaiming myself outraged and calling your painting offensive. We can’t have breasts. You understand don’t you?”