Tyler Green
Art-focused Journalism by Tyler Green

Tyler Green Modern Art Notes

Archive for August, 2010

Two paintings, one storm cloud

I find it interesting when two artists, half a world a part, make similar paintings at pretty much the same time. That tells us something about art as a shared, international visual language — and it tells us something about that particular time in human history.

This is Chaim Soutine’s Return from School After the Storm, from the Phillips Collection. Soutine painted Return in 1939, after two of the wildest years of his life. (And this is Windy Day, Auxerre, painted at about the same time.) In 1937 Soutine experienced a professional triumph: By virtue of his participation in a show for non-French artists at the Jeu de Paume, life-long outsider Soutine was finally hailed as a master. By 1939, Nazi atrocities against Jews were well underway. When the Germans invaded France in 1940, Soutine was forced to run and hide wherever he could. He died in 1943 from a perforated ulcer. He was 50 years old. The optimism of this painting’s title has always amazed me.

This is John Rogers Cox’s Gray and Gold, from 1942, the year after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and the year in which America fully joined the war. It’s in the collection of the Cleveland Museum of Art. Cox was an American regionalist from Terre Haute, Ind., about as far as you can get from Paris. In 1943 he joined the Army. After the war Life magazine published a feature story on Cox titled, “JOHN ROGERS COX: Bank clerk wins fame painting wheat fields.”

Sources: Hirshhorn director Koshalek announces gift

According to multiple sources, Hirshhorn director Richard Koshalek told attendees of the museum’s recent annual August ‘Martini Party’ that he has secured a seven-figure gift from a New York donor for the museum’s ‘Bulbous Membrane’ project. [Update, Sept. 21: The Hirshhorn confirms that it has received a seven-figure gift from New York. Please see here for details and an explanation.]

A Hirshhorn spokesperson confirmed the announcement in an email to MAN today, adding that it is from a donor who wishes to remain anonymous and that “there is nothing further on that for the moment.”

The inflatable pavilion/event space has received backing from the Smithsonian, but Smithsonian secretary G. Wayne Clough told MAN that the museum should not expect financial support from the Castle. The temporary pavilion is designed by Diller Scofidio + Renfro (and, infamously, hews rather closely to a Rem Koolhaas-Cecil Balmondo design).

The museum’s plans for the non-structure were first revealed on MAN in April, 2009. I wrote in opposition to the project here. Washington Post art critic Blake Gopnik is also concerned about the museum’s direction. The museum’s fundraising for the ‘Membrane’ made news earlier this summer when MAN revealed that the Hirshhorn director’s office was taking odd measures to make the museum — which is already one of America’s most-visited modern and contemporary art museums — appear more crowded. In July a museum spokesperson told MAN that the museum would not be making any announcements regarding ‘Membrane’ fundraising until the fall.

America’s Favorite Art Museum: We have finalists

The finals are set in America’s Favorite Art Museum tournament. To the surprise of no one, the two museums who have had the most dedicated, intense support this month advance in blowouts. (And, in Toledo’s case, likely aided — though not decisively — by the Toledo Blade’s coverage of the tourney.) Voting in the finals begins Wednesday and will run through Sunday.

  • Toledo Museum of Art d. Cleveland Museum of Art 76%-24%.
  • Clark Art Institute d. Philadelphia Museum of Art 77%-23%.

Weekend roundup

  • Last week I asked my Twitter followers how the NYT would handle the “Work of Art” show at the Brooklyn Museum given that the paper’s top America-based art critic is married to one of the show’s celebrity-judges. Answer: The paper assigned Karen Rosenberg to the show, and after delivering a token semi-kiss to Jerry Saltz, she clobbered it.
  • MAN’s been posting on this for some time and now the NYT is covering the story: Malcolm Gay on integrating the Gateway Arch with downtown St. Louis.
  • In the LAT, Liesl Bradner notes that one of America’s most important artists, Catherine Opie, has been looking at football. (MAN on a show at the Wexner that included same.)
  • A judge tells Fisk University that it may not sell Georgia O’Keeffe’s bequest to Crystal Bridges doyenne Alice Walton.
  • I am not the only one driven batty by certain museums’ lousy websites. The Cleveland Plain Dealer’s Steven Litt is too.

America’s Favorite Art Museum: The rest of the final four

Here’s the second final four match-up in MAN’s America’s Favorite Art Museum tourney. The first match-up is here. Voting closes at 5pm Sunday.

Philadelphia Museum of Art on MAN: Bruce Nauman’s Days, Cezanne and Beyond (part two, three), Then were the Philly Museum visitors glad when they saw the gore. The museum’s collection website.

Clark Art Institute on MAN: Five things from my visit to the Clark last summer.  The museum’s collection website.

Poll has expired.

Wednesday links

  • The Amon Carter’s blog reminds us there’s a kick-ass tradition of American road-trip photography;
  • “The Broad Collection” gets the green light that matters most;
  • Met curator Keith Christiansen explains why he thinks this new-to-the-Met Giovanni di Milano painting is about the sense of touch. I love it when smart people spend time unpacking one painting;
  • Greg Allen muses on semi-early astronomy photography, complete with a well-earned hat-tip to the Clark Art Institute; and
  • The Art Institute of Chicago shows off how it uninstalls a Richard Serra.

America’s Favorite Art Museum: The final four

We’re down to four in MAN’s America’s Favorite Art Museum tournament. The first final four match-up pits one museum that has been working social media and probably every other form of digital communication imaginable to run up huge vote totals. The passion Toledoans have for the Toledo Museum of Art is clear. The TMA’s opponent has been the tortoise of the tournament: Slow, steady, knocking off all comers. The first semi-final:

Cleveland Museum of Art on MAN: Cleveland acquires a Mark Grotjahn. Cleveland acquires an Omer Fast. [Both are on view now.] Updating 1916 in Cleveland. The museum’s collection website.

Toledo Museum of Art on MAN: Toledo acquires a 1963 Wayne Thiebaud. Toledo acquires a sexy Paul Cadmus. Childe Hassam and two-point perspective. The museum’s collection website.

The poll has expired.

Finalists’ designs unveiled in Gateway Arch competition

The designs of the five finalists in the competition to link St. Louis’ Gateway Arch grounds to the city and the river were released today in St. Louis. The competition should be of special interest to art lovers for several reasons: The Gateway Arch is the largest, most expensive work of public art in America and the Arch probably played a key role in enabling the earthworks movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Los Angeles Times architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne has called it, “one of the most intriguing design competitions now underway in any American city.” And each competing team was expected to have an artist on board. [Image: Behnisch team's museum view.]

Here are the five competing groups with links to their designs and presentations (as well as links to the artist/studio with which each team would work):

Most of the project teams have yet to fully detail how the artist(s) on their team would contribute to the project. Two exceptions are Skidmore’s plan, which would place Jaume Plensa’s Whispering Leaves in Kiener Plaza [at left, and on pages 106-109 in this presentation] and Weiss/Manfredi’s plan, which includes a detailed brief from Mark Dion about recommended elements.

Dion’s recommendation has three parts:

  • “[A] type of programming which hybridizes the approach of several of the more energetic and inventive sculpture parks, all of which also feature ambitious public event programming such as film screenings, musical performances, and theatrical arts. The two examples I offer are the Socrates Sculpture Park in Long Island City, New York and the Olympic Sculpture Park of the Seattle Art Museum.”;
  • “An annual sculpture invitational exhibition located primarily at Kiener Plaza. This exhibition of outdoor works should have a direct link to the sculpture performance and digital studios. While Kiener Plaza occupies a core for an exhibition program, it is imaginable that a variety of projects could take form in other locations in the park or in the city as well.”; and
  • The commissioning of significant earthworks for the Illinois side of the river.

(Dion’s proposal is pages 145-147 in this presentation.)

Related: The St. Louis Beacon’s package on the announcement. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch’s package on the announcement. I’ll add links to Hawthorne and the Chicago Tribune’s Blair Kamin when they’re available.

Moments of amusing incongruity

Most of the time there’s no reason to wonder why art museums put up ‘hello, parents!’ warning labels near certain works of art. No big deal. But on a recent trip to the Cleveland Museum of Art, this incongruity struck me as slightly amusing…

Below: A still from Omer Fast’s The Casting. The Cleveland Museum of Art bought it last year. It’s on view now. (I’d link to the exhibition, but I can’t figure out how. I wasn’t sure this was possible, but Cleveland’s new website is less usable than MoMA’s.) Update: A reader helps out!

This is the warning label that the museum has installed outside the black-box space in which it has installed The Casting.

This is Jacques-Louis David’s lascivious Cupid and Psyche, one of the highlight’s of the CMA’s collection. It is installed in the museum’s European collection galleries.

There’s no warning label anywhere near it.

America’s Favorite Art Museum: Round of 8 Results

The round of eight in MAN’s America’s Favorite Art Museum tourney is the round in which the social media accounts and email lists asserted themselves most forcefully. Our final four is made up of four strong museums with four highly respected collections, but look at those margins…

Round of eight results:

  • Toledo Museum of Art d. Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, 65%-35%.
  • Cleveland Museum of Art d. Worcester Art Museum, 64%-36%.
  • Philadelphia Museum of Art d. Seattle Art Museum 69%-31%.
  • Clark Art Institute d. National Gallery of Art 79%-21%.