Jason Edward Kaufman
Jason Edward Kaufman on Art and Culture

IN VIEW: Jason Edward Kaufman

Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Frick Lectures Going Online

Renoir, Dance at Bougival, 1883

Renoir's Dance at Bougival, 1883, now at the Frick

The Frick has begun to stream its lectures, so you don’t have to be on the Upper East Side of Manhattan to attend. The inaugural offering – all free of charge – was an overview by deputy director Colin Bailey about Renoir’s full-length figure paintings from 1874 to 1885, ten of which are the subject of a show he curated (on view through May 13). Bailey illustrated his talk with archival photographs, prints, related paintings, fashion ads, and all sorts of correspondence and other documents to conjure Renoir’s personal life and the dynamics of his career. It was interesting to discover that Albert Barnes had made an offer for Renoir’s La Promenadethe year before Henry Clay Frick bought it, and that Frick, who preferred Old Masters, had planned to return it, though of course he decided not to.

Bailey uncovered these details in researching the catalogue that accompanies his show in the East Room. The highlight is Dance at Bougival flanked by Dance in the Country and Dance in the City – a trio of life-size figure paintings with wall power. I would place the Dance at Bougival, from the MFA Boston, among Renoir’s finest paintings, along with Ball at the Moulin de la Galette in the Musee d’Orsay, Luncheon of the Boating Party at the Phillips, Madame Charpentier with her Children at the Metropolitan, perhaps the violin-playing Clown in Oterlo, and I suppose the Great Bathers in Philadelphia. I’m partial also to a radiant sunlit view over the Seine in the National Gallery’s new installation of its French and other paintings. Say what you wish about Renoir’s candy-box confections of Parisian society, the man could paint.

When the Met mounted a show about the dealer Ambrose Vollard, a highlight for me was the brief Gaumont film that captured the aging Renoir receiving his dealer in the studio. In an instant Renoir rose from the frozen annals of art history as a breathing human being. It was a humbling and quietly astonishing experience that recalibrated my sense of the man. Here is a similar clip that has the same effect. Bailey’s lecture furthered my education.

An excerpt of his talk is online and within a week the full lecture will be here. (Be advised, the programs are preceded by an ad.) The Renoir program continues with talks about the artist’s mistress (Feb. 22), his portrayal of Parisian women (March 7), his attention to fashion (March 28) and his career as portraitist (April 4). But first there is a talk about former Frick director Charles Ryskamp’s collecting (Feb. 15). For a complete listing click here.

- Jason Kaufman

Why Would Anyone Collect Conceptual Art?

Barbara and Aaroon Levine.

Barbara and Aaron Levine in their Washington, DC home, with Duchamp's Box en Valise (1941) in the foreground. (Photo: Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011).

People who collect contemporary art often pretend to be savants of culture. Their vanity can be tiresome when celebrity, money and power serve as substitutes for taste, discernment and social responsibility. Then there are collectors of a quieter and more bookish bent whose acquisitions are guided by historical perspective, intellectual curiosity and humility. They value artworks not primarily for their escalating auction estimates or auras of chic, but for their capacities to change the way the collectors see the world.

The Levines in their bedroom, lined with Warhol "Mao" prints.

The Levines in their bedroom, lined with Warhol "Mao" prints. (Photo: Jason Edwrd Kaufman (c) 2011)

Washington, D.C. has many collectors in this category, and among them are certainly Barbara and Aaron Levine. They are not major philanthropists on the scale of Duncan Phillips or Joseph Hirshhorn, but they bring comparable seriousness, perspicacity and enthusiasm to collecting. A recent tour of their Georgian house suggests that they are more interested in ideas than in big-ticket trophies and eye candy.

Aaron Levine.

Aaron Levine with a miniature replica of Duchamp's Bicycle Wheel. (Photo: Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

They do have beautiful high-end paintings, sculptures, photographs and prints (see image above), but the Levines specialize in conceptual art, which tends toward visual understatement. The premise of the movement, which coalesced in New York in the early 1960s, is that the artwork doesn’t need any physical expression; it exists in the realm of ideas.

The notion that the work of art is an idea and not a splendid thing to hang on the wall doesn’t exactly quicken the pulse of the average art lover. Even seasoned art aficionados can find it a bit obscure, if not downright dry and ungratifying. Who in their right mind would collect this stuff?

The Levines have stenciled the toilets in their house with Duchamp's pseudonymous "R. Mutt" signature from his notorious urinal.

The Levines have stenciled the toilets in their house with Duchamp's pseudonymous "R. Mutt" signature from his notorious urinal. (Photo: Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

The Levines — she is a longtime trustee of the Hirshhorn Museum and he is a lawyer who fights pharmaceutical companies — have more Conceptual art than any museum in town. They are obsessed with Marcel Duchamp and with his latter-day disciples Joseph Kosuth, Lawrence Weiner, and many others. What’s more, they can explain how Conceptual works impact the way they see the world. And they do so not without a self-aware dollop of humor (see image to left).

When I was in graduate school Conceptual Art, along with structural theory and semiotics, were the reigning orthodoxy. I dove in because it was germane to the  philosophical and epistemological questions that seemed so urgent at the time. They still are urgent questions, but we get caught up in the familiar and mundane and ignore the enigmas. No one seems to have time to pursue a life of the mind. It is refreshing to meet collectors who surround themselves with objects that function as interlocutors in that essential conversation.

Click here for more photographs of their extensive collection, and to read my complete profile in The Washington Post. To access past articles click here.

Jason Edward Kaufman

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Museums Move into the Digital Future, Smartphones in Hand

The Google Art Project allows virtual visits to a growing network of museums.

The Google Art Project allows virtual visits to a growing network of museums.

Imagine the museum of the future.

You step inside your home tele-dec and settle into an armchair that self-adjusts to your comfort settings. “Computer,” you command, “load the National Gallery of Art.” The room brightens and you find yourself in the atrium of the great Washington institution.

In the air above the information desk a menu reads: Permanent Collection, Special Exhibitions, Timeline of Art History, and Lounge.

“Timeline,” you say, and the great hall becomes a mist out of which emerges a semi-circle of lifelike 3-D images of iconic sculptures and paintings from prehistory to the present.

Giotto's Scrovegni Chapel frescoes, Padua, 1303-05.

Giotto's Scrovegni Chapel frescoes, Padua, 1303-05.

“Italian Renaissance frescoes,” you say, and the scene converts to masterworks by Giotto, Ghirlandaio, Michelangelo and others. The hovering menu suggests tours by chronology, location, iconography, or patronage, but you feel like exploring the work of a single artist.

“Giotto,” you command, and you are inside the Scrovegni Chapel in Padua.

A holographic docent appears before you and asks, “Where shall we begin?” “Tour iconography,” you say, and the docent walks slowly towards a scene of the Birth of the Virgin on the wall to the left, your chair swiveling to follow her movement.

“The Florentine painter Giotto,” she begins, “was commissioned by Enrico degli Scrovegni to decorate the interior of a small chapel he had built adjoining his palace on the site of the former Roman arena in Padua. From 1303 to 1305 Giotto frescoed the walls with scenes from the lives of the Joachim and Anna, their daughter the Virgin Mary, and her son Jesus  Christ, as well as the Last Judgement. The cycle begins here,” says the guide,” gesturing as illumination increases on a rectangular scene showing Joachim praying in the desert.

We’re not there yet, but technological leaps are rapidly making possible remote access to images and information about art museum collections. And that information already includes pictures, texts, audio and video guides, not to mention  conversations with museum professionals and fellow museum lovers who convene through social media. Could the home tele-dec be far away?

Tap mobile app from Indianapolis Museum of Art.

Indianapolis Museum of Art developed TAP, an open-source platform that enables museums to create mobile apps for iPods.

The digital transformation of museum-going is the subject of my latest article in The Washington Post.

Nancy Proctor, the Smithsonian’s head of mobile strategy and initiatives, would like a visitor to be able to aim a smartphone camera at an object, have it do a visual search of all images in the museum database, tell the visitor what they are looking at and provide additional information about it.

That’s the foreseeable future, though image recognition does not work well yet for three-dimensional objects. And image-recognition software requires access throughout the museum to Wi-Fi or the web. Mobile phone broadband speeds are expected to increase making it perhaps the preferable route to the Internet.

An alternative would locate the object by GPS, but most museums lack the infrastructure (and satellite connectivity) to provide it, though something along these lines is where we are headed.

“If I could snap my fingers I would make Wi-Fi in every Smithsonian building to connect with SI.edu and other resources,” says Proctor, “with everything digitized in the highest resolution in 3D. And we’d recruit the world to help do the work of the Smithsonian,” she says, explaining that visitors could tag attributes of the objects they encounter, making that information searchable to other users.

The consensus among experts is that the field is still in the R&D phase, testing strategies and new technologies to learn which approaches will best serve museums’ missions. But all agree that museums inexorably are moving into the brave new virtual world.

The Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of African American History and Culture won’t open until 2015, but the museum is working on an application that will let people look through their phone cameras at the future site on the Mall and see a ghostly image of the building as it will one day appear.

The Street Museum in London used similar “augmented reality” software to allow users to overlay historic photos of urban scenes onto the actual views on their phone screens. And the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam enlisted augmented reality in a project that allowed the public to take 3D images of works in the collection and “hang” them in real space where they would be visible by other users of the software.

The Museum of Modern Art’s current “Talk to Me” exhibit of human-machine interactive devices employs quick response (QR) codes and Twitter hashtags for each object, enabling visitors to scan the coded images to call up dedicated Web pages and associated Tweets.

Visitors to MoMA's "Talk to Me" exhibition. (Photo (c) MoMA)

Visitors to MoMA's "Talk to Me" exhibition. (Photo (c) MoMA)

Google’s Art Project has made self-guided video tours of 17 museums possible on your computer, and the company expects to add many more institutions to the network while improving navigation and search across multiple collections.

Looking ahead, the Indianapolis Museum of Art has an Institute of Museum and Library Services grant to use eye-tracking equipment that will chart a visitor’s gaze, recognizing when a person is standing in front of an object, which part of it they are looking at, for how long, and what they looked at next. “We want to know how viewers process looking at artworks and if our labels respond to that,” says Rob Stein, the lead software designer at the Indianapolis Museum of Art.

Marc Sands, director of audiences and media at the Tate in London, and previously the head of online ventures for the Guardian newspaper, says that curators have been reluctant to work on web projects. But just as journalists over the past decade recognized that their audiences are online, curators, too are seeing the digital light. “They are writing for the Web now, but it will move to video and audio soon,” he says.

“Something digital was something you’d think about at the end of the exhibition. Now we are asking curators to think about digital enhancements from the get go for their exhibitions,” says Carrie Rebora Barratt, associate director for collections and administration at the Metropolitan Museum, which launched a redesigned website last week.

Bellini and Titian's "The Feast of the Gods," 1514/1529, in the National Gallery of Art.

Bellini and Titian's "The Feast of the Gods," 1514/1529, in the National Gallery of Art. Wouldn't it be useful to have it on your smartphone screen replete with notes identifying the figures and providing a historical overview?

The in-gallery experience is likely to be profoundly transformed, though no one knows precisely how. Perhaps many visitors, especially younger ones, would love to be able to stand in front of a painting — say Bellini and Titian’s Feast of the Gods in the National Gallery — and have the image automatically appear on their smartphone screens with an overlay identifying each of the depicted figures. Perhaps they want to tap on menu items for in-depth information and to hear a curator via their earpods discuss the work and its creators.

This sort of experience is within grasp for museums. Some already come close, and for others it seems less a question of “if” so much as “when.”

To read more about the fast approaching brave new virtual world of museums, click here or on one of the images.

Jason Edward Kaufman

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Nuit Blanche Brings a Night of Light to New York

Still from Diller and Scofido's Soft Sell (1993), single-channel projection with sound.

Still from Diller and Scofido's Soft Sell (1993), single-channel projection with sound.

We all met at the 34th Street Ferry that took us across the East River ($4 each way) to Greenpoint where curators of Nuit Blanche New York showed us a few of the 50 or so artworks — all involving light – that will be lining the blue-collar streets and filling a few of the disused factories for one night only – tonight, Oct. 1.

We strolled down the India Street pier towards a projection of a pair of luscious red lips asking us a series of question, each beginning, “How would you like….” (The saleswoman in Diller & Scofidio’s “Soft Sell” offered everything from “a clean credit record” to “a new identity,” but never got around to the one thing many of us were waiting for.)

Around the corner a Tony Oursler-style eye by Marcos Zotes-Lopez blinked from the top of ten-story-high water tower, U.S. and Polish troops recounted their Iraqi experiences as a candle flickered in a Krztsztof Wodiczko video in a local bar, and Eli Keszler busily stretched piano wires on walls in preparation for a performance.

The roster assembled by creative director Ken Farmer promises work by Dustin Yellin, Luke Dubois, Chakaia Booker, Daniel Canogar, Jeremy Blake, Richard Serra (films from the ’60s and ’70s) and dozens of others, as well as musical performances and a youth poetry slam from an ice-cream-like POEMobile – all within a few blocks.

The organizers told us ink-stained wretches that the time to arrive on Saturday night will be around sunset, and that ferries back to Manhattan go ’til midnight. For more information click the lips.

Jason Edward Kaufman

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Collecting Latin American Art in Washington, D.C.: Daniel & Mirella Levinas

Daniel & Mirella Levinas. (Photo Astrid Riecken)

Daniel & Mirella Levinas. (Photo Astrid Riecken)

The facade of Daniel and Mirella Levinas’s mansion off Wisconsin Avenue looks like many white-brick houses in Georgetown. Greek revival details convey patrician heritage and conservative taste without a hint that behind the pilastered doorway is a pristine, ultra-modern museum.

Inside unfolds a domestic variation on the gallery style known as “the white cube.” Walls and floors are rectilinear planes stripped of decorative flourishes, and rooms are a sea of white, relieved here and there by a patch of muted color on the sparse furnishings. Where you would expect to find furniture, curious functionless objects beckon.

The first thing you see is a stack of Warhol-style Brillo boxes made of puckered paper, covered with hand-drawn logos and lettering in black and white (by Spanish artist Javier Arce). In the foyer stands a white monochrome figure with a clutch of colored fluorescent lights slung over his shoulder (Catalan artist Bernardi Roig). A translucent fabric scrim that at first looks like a solid wall becomes a screen for a surprising video projection.

Juan Munoz, Balcony, is mounted high on a wall.

Juan Munoz, Balcony, is mounted high on a wall.

It feels so much like a public gallery that you have to remind yourself that you are visiting a private home.

Some people collect stamps, cars, guns, stuffed animals, wine or Civil War memorabilia. The Levinases collect contemporary art. The Argentine couple have hundreds of sculptures, paintings, drawings, photographs, videos and artist books, mainly by younger artists from Latin America.

The list includes prominent figures such as León Ferrari, Vik Muniz, Cildo Meireles, Matthew Barney, Olafur Eliasson, Liliana Porter and many others who may not be household names, but who have soaring reputations among experts. But the couple are known particularly for discovering talented artists.

Daniel Levinas in his living room. (Photo by Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

Daniel Levinas in his living room. Foreground, a painted-wood piece by Manu Muniategiandikoetxea, and in distance, flourescent bulbs blossom in tree piece by Carlos Schwartz. (Photo by Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

“Every time you visit his home, it’s a learning experience,” says Richard Koshalek, director of the Smithsonian’s Hirshhorn Museum, where since last year Daniel Levinas has served on the board. “There are going to be works by emerging artists not known by other collectors, and many times not known by curators of major museums. His exploratory sensibility is extremely important for the Hirshhorn, which has to have a global vision, a great awareness of what’s happening in other parts of the world.”

“They’re not looking for the proverbial painting over the couch,” says Leigh Conner, owner of Conner Contemporary Art in Northeast Washington. “They’re very adventurous collectors, open to what art can be, whether it’s a video or a sculpture made of forks and paper plates,” she says, referring to a hedgehog-like assemblage of plastic dinnerware by local artist Dan Steinhilber that the couple purchased from G. Fine Art.

That piece — among the few by local artists currently on display — occupies a nook in Daniel’s book-lined study. A nearby balcony overlooks the living room, a cavernous, light-filled chamber with double-height ceilings and a polished stone floor that extends some 30 yards in length. Sunlight floods in through a floor-to-ceiling glass wall onto a seating area around a square table laden with art books and small sculptures.

Levinas living room with Javier Arces mural after DIego Rivera. (Photo by Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

Levinas living room with Javier Arces mural after DIego Rivera. (Photo by Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

Mounted above a recessed fireplace is a crumpled-paper mural with a black-and-white rendition of a famous fresco by Mexican master Diego Rivera (also by Arce). Around the room, sculptures rest on pedestals or directly on the floor, culminating at the far end in a raised mezzanine where dried trees bloom with fluorescent bulbs (Spanish artist Carlos Schwartz).

Cubbyhole shelves contain a miscellany of framed photographs, drawings and precious objects. And the entire glass wall retracts to open onto an enclosed patio where a giant Dixie Cup-shaped fountain continually pours water into a swimming pool.

We’re a long way from the conventional image of inside-the-Beltway living.

There are all sorts of explanations for why people collect: prestige and social climbing, financial investment, or even, as some psychological theories hold, as a form of sexual display or a way to compensate for trauma or loss. Daniel and Mirella claim more wholesome motivations. “We collect to be surrounded by things that we like,” Mirella says. “Other people have plants in their house. We don’t.”

Artworks in Levinas wall display. (Photo by Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

Artworks in Levinas wall display. (Photo by Jason Edward Kaufman (c) 2011)

These days, wealthy collectors often hire curators or consultants to tell them what to buy. The Levinases do their own hunting. “It’s part of the excitement,” Mirella explains, ticking off a list of recent expeditions from New York to Basel, Madrid to Mexico City. Their next trip is to the Venice Biennale, with stops in Trieste, Italy; Ljubljana, Slovenia; and Berlin to visit artists’ studios. “Some people enjoy going to the beach, and some people enjoy going to a museum or to see an artist or installation. For us, to see art is pleasure,” she says.

For slide show of works in the collection and to read the complete profile click here or one of the images above.

Jason Edward Kaufman

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

At the Met Opera, Balancing Novelty and Tradition

The Metropolitan Opera’s season is in full tilt, with intriquing additions and changes to the standard repertory. More new productions — and renowned talent — are slated for 2011-2012.

Should The Metropolitan Opera stick with its celebrated traditional productions or should it innovate and risk alienating its graying audience? The question came to the foreground this past year with the first part of a new production of Wagner’s “Ring” cycle directed by Canadian Robert Lepage, and a minimalist production of La Traviata imported from the Salzburger Festspiele. Not everyone greets innovation with open arms. When one critic complained at the season preview press conference earlier this year, general manager Peter Gelb responded, “It is necessary to renew the repertory productions from time to time.” And indeed, the 2011-12 season brings seven new productions along with the revamped “Ring,” not to mention a world premiere.

The Met’s new productions promise to generate the sort of excitement lacking at many institutions. The Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., for example, was recently pilloried by The Washington Post for planning a season devoid of the risk-taking and innovation that the center’s president, performing arts guru Michael Kaiser, preaches in his Arts Management Institute. But new is not always better. Das Rheingold opened last season in a production whose innovation is a huge stage machine composed of motorized upright planks, a kind of palisade that morphs into angled ground planes and serves as a screen for abstract projections. I found this high-tech behemoth distractingly anachronistic and I longed for more traditional staging.

The new production of Siegfried will feature three-dimensional projections.

The new production of Siegfried will feature three-dimensional projections. (All photos Met Opera)

For the coming season’s rendition of Siegfried, Lepage is adding a new effect – a three-dimensional projection that will create the illusion of deep space behind the singers. We’ll see if it sufficiently masks the planks. In any case, we can look forward to Deborah Voigt, Bryn Terfel, Erich Owens, and Gerhard Siegel in leading roles, and to James Levine in his 40th season conducting. Sidelined by back problems and kidney surgery, the maestro has stepped down as music director of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, but there is every hope that he will be in form for the Met season. (Die Walküre is presented throughout April and May, Siegfried begins in November 1, and the final component, Götterdämmerung, opens January 27, 2012; three complete cycles will take place  in April and May 2012. )

La Traviata: a Thrilling Import

Stripped down decor in La Traviata at the Met.

Stripped down decor in La Traviata at the Met.

Then again, new productions can be bracing and heighten our attention to the music, players and dramatic tensions. In these respects, the current season’s recent La Traviata, though far more radically innovative than the Rheingold machine, was brilliant. The minimal set – invented for the 2005 production directed by Willy Decker – consists only of a semicircular wall facing the audience with a banquet seat running along the interior, a couch or two center stage, and a giant clock on the right. Above the wall, reaching into the fly space, a flower-printed scrim remains grey during the parts when love is vexed, and blossoms passionate red during Violetta and Alfredo’s brief period of happiness.

The stripped down décor and raked stage focus attention on the figures in a way that emphasizes their acting and the singing. Marina Poplavskaya as Violetta rises to the occasion. She enters during the overture, escaping from a party, and through her body language silently conveys angst and fatigue. A swarm of black-tuxedoed men arrive and she – in a striking red cocktail dress – rallies her strength and in the classic anthem “Libiamo” she captivates them with her allures, leaping onto the couches, wielding a champagne bottle, and flirting with aplomb.

La Traviata

Marina Poplavskaya in La Traviata at the Met.

At the performance I attended, Poplavskaya’s voice was agile, attractive and expressive of the heroine’s roller-coaster emotions. She was more convincing in her role than Matthew Polenzani as Germont, though that has more to do with his flaccid physical demeanor than his voice, which was satisfyingly masculine and sincere in the “Un di felice” duet. Andrzej Dobber, as his father, was outstanding in pleading with Violetta to give up the affair, creating with Poplavskaya an affecting rapport of mutual understanding. But it is Poplavskaya’s vocal and physical exuberance that lingers in memory.  (La Traviata resumes in April and May 2012 with Natalie Dessay in the title role.)

Donizetti’s Don Pasquale: a Worthy Addition

The newly introduced production of Don Pasquale, an opera buffa by Donizetti, is another success that brings together all these strands in a wonderful evening of theater. The commedia dell’arte characters comprise the aging corpulent Pasquale, the nephew he plans to disinherit, the plebeian widow Norina whom the nephew loves, and slick, dapper Doctor Malatesta who devises a scheme to bring the lovers together. It’s light fare, a kind of musical sit-com with a lively score, comic flourishes, and an opera rarity – a happy ending.

Don Pasquale at the Met.

Rooftop terrace in Don Pasquale at the Met.

The production hews to tradition with splendid sets including Pascuale’s broken-down palace replete with a strut holding up a listing column, a rooftop terrace where Norina reads romances, and a nocturnal garden scene where Ernesto (Matthew Polenzani) delivers a serenade that transports us to Roman night. A duet by Pasquale (John Del Carlo) and Malatesta (Mariusz Kwiecien) intertwines rapid staccato lines as they fall over one another in mannered mutual regard. It was so delightful that when it ended the singers stepped in front of the curtain and repeated it, a throwback to times when such mid-opera encores were often demanded by appreciative audiences. I hope the Met does this more often.

Anna Netrebko as Norina in Don Pasquale t the Met.

Anna Netrebko as Norina in Don Pasquale t the Met.

Anna Netrebko as Norina couples her youthful exuberance and a talent for acting with a superb voice that combines great range, precision, and sweetness. During her Act One aria “Quel guardo il cavaliere,” in which she declares her free spirit, she prances around the terrace and even does a somersault onto her chaise longue. (Alas, Don Pasquale will not be performed again this coming season.)

Netrebko is an international star, and the Met says that she will be here more than anywhere else this coming season. Her parts include the title role of Jules Massenet’s Manon (throughout March and April), and Anna Bolena in the Met premier of Donizetti’s eponymous opera (September and October, then early February 2012). In a video interview she describes the Donizetti as “challenging, dramatic and beautiful,” and cites Maria Callas and Beverly Sills as the exemplars whose interpretations have most impressed her.

The Enchanted Island: a New Take on an Old Operatic Form

The Met is also introducing a novel operatic form: the pasticcio, which consists of setting a new libretto to a score comprising disparate parts of existing operas. The form was common in the 18th century when Handel was among the practitioners. The Met commissioned a libretto from Jeremy Sams who developed a narrative merging aspects of Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream and The Tempest. Dubbed The Enchanted Island, The music is Baroque, a mix of Handel, Vivaldi, Rameau and others. My first reaction was, Oh, no. It sounds like when radio stations play only the popular movements of symphonies.

It’s another “We’ll see,” but as usual, the Met lined up an all-star cast including Joyce DiDonato, Danielle de Niese, David Daniels, and a cameo by Placido Domingo. At a press preview, the countertenor Daniels performed an excerpt with such intensity and rigorous beauty that it swept away any concerns for the pastiche form. (The Enchanted Island premiers Dec. 31, 2011.)

Mariusz Kwiecien will star in Don Giovanni at the Met.

Mariusz Kwiecien will star in Don Giovanni at the Met.

There are more new productions, including Mozart’s Don Giovanni with Mariusz Kwiecien in the role looking, as one fellow critic noted, like Johnny Depp; and Charles Gounod’s Faust in a co-production with the English National Opera that features Jonas Kaufmann as Faust, Rene Pape as Mephistopheles, and Angela Gheorghiu as Marguerite.

And there is plenty to satisfy traditionalists. Throughout the season the Met mounts repertory productions of Verdi’s Aida, La Traviata, Macbeth, Ernani and Nabucco, Rossini’s Il Barbiere di Siviglia,  Puccini’s La BohemeMadama Butterfly and Tosca, Donizetti’s L’Elisir d’Amore and La Fille du Regiment, Britten’s Billy Budd, Humperdinck’s Hansel and Gretel, Mussorgsky’s Khovanshcina, Handel’s Rodelinda, Janacek’s The Makropulos Case, and Philip Glass’s Satyagraha.

Earlier Curtain Time, More Intermissions and Simulcasts in Movie Theaters

One innovation unlikely to encounter any opposition is the Met’s decision, responding to public demand, to change the curtain time from 8 pm to 7:30 pm in most cases. Apparently opera enthusiasts like to get to bed on time. Another adjustment will be tinkering with intermissions to insure that audience members’ attention is on the stage and not their bladders.

The Met announced also that it is expanding its “Live in HD” movie-theater simulcasts of select performances. It’s not only a marvelous way to expand the opera’s graying wealthy audience, but in many ways it offers a superior experience to sitting in the opera house. The camera is positioned to bring the viewer close to the action, able to see changing expressions of the singers that from afar are utterly unintelligible, and to follow the back and forth of action. I know it’s sacrilege to say so, but even in the orchestra the seating is not raked sufficiently to make for unobstructed sight lines (and to not worry about blocking the person behind you), the legroom is lacking for all but the petite, and the cavernous space subdues all but the most projective voices. The excitement and intimacy of feeling close to the performers is rarely achieved.

For that, one would do better to attend one of the eleven high-definition Saturday matinee simulcasts taking place this season: Anna Bolena (Oct. 15), Don Giovanni (Oct. 29), Siegfried (Nov. 5), Satyagraha (Nov. 19), Rodelinda (Dec. 3), Faust (Dec. 10), The Enchanted Island (Jan. 21), Götterdämmerung (Feb. 11), Ernani (Feb. 25), Manon (Apr. 7) and La Traviata (Apr. 14). Gelb says they have passed the seven million mark in tickets since it began six years ago. Opera for the masses: now that’s an innovation.

Jason Edward Kaufman

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Whitney’s Breuer Building Should Become the New International Center of Photography

The Whitney Museum's building by Marcel Breuer. (Photo (c) Ezra Stoller)

A new proposal by Jason Edward Kaufman calls for the Breuer building to serve as ICP’s new home. The city should promote and help finance the relocation.

The fate of the Whitney Museum’s longtime home on Madison Avenue should be of concern to everyone with an interest in the cultural life of New York City. Designed by Marcel Breuer, the structure is an architectural landmark that has housed an integral component of the cultural fabric of the city for nearly half a century. The Whitney plans to open a new flagship in the Meatpacking District in 2015, and claims that it will operate the uptown building as a second facility. No one believes this. The museum has had enough trouble operating one facility let alone two. So the question remains: What becomes of the Breuer building?

While the Whitney’s leaders dissemble about their long-term intentions, they have made known that they are in discussion with The Metropolitan Museum to lease the Breuer building for use as a temporary showcase either for the Met’s 20th-century art or some collaboration between the two museums. During the lease, the Met would renovate its Wallace Wing for modern and contemporary art, after which the Met would return home rather than seek to operate in perpetuity a satellite museum on Madison Avenue. So, again we are left with the question, what would be the ideal use of the Whitney’s building on Madison Avenue?

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Justin Davidson wrote a piece recently in New York magazine advancing the suggestion of Robert A.M. Stern that the Breuer building should become a museum of architecture. It’s a lovely idea, and Davidson is a lively and persuasive writer. Indeed, there is considerable public interest in the celebrity-studded field of architecture. And if the tiny Skyscraper Museum near the Battery and the NY chapter of the American Institute of Architects’ Center for Architecture in the Village draw only a few visitors, a full-size museum in the heavily trafficked Upper East Side would attract many more.

But there are practical and fundamental problems with the idea. For starters, a new museum of architecture would need a collection, and most of the important documents for the history of the field already are ensconced in museums and archives such as the Getty and the Canadian Centre for Architecture. If the fledgling museum were building a collection it would have to focus only on contemporary architecture, and most practitioners are not willing to part with their archives until they retire. Besides, their archives are mainly digital files and not the stuff of great exhibitions.

Let’s say the institution were a non-collecting kunsthalle for loan exhibitions. MoMA and the Guggenheim have mounted highly successful shows of celebrated architects such as Frank Lloyd Wright and Frank Gehry, but lesser lights are a harder sell to the general public. That’s why museums dedicated to architecture tend to serve a specialist rather than general audience. Have you ever considered making a special trip to visit the Canadian Centre for Architecture in Montreal, the Netherlands Architecture Institute in Rotterdam, or the National Building Museum in Washington?

Museum displays of architecture are notoriously difficult. Construction plans are not all that interesting to non-specialists, so shows tend to focus on models, photographs and increasingly videos and digital animations. Such displays could work in the Breuer building, but I imagine that a vital museum of architecture these days will incorporate actual architectural works in its program – like PS1’s Young Architects Program, or the Serpentine Gallery Pavilion series in London. An architecture museum in the Breuer building could commission projects for the sunken court along Madison Avenue, but that’s a constrained setting, and the City Parks Department would never condone an ongoing presence in Central Park.

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

And even if it were ideal for an architecture museum, the Breuer building would be virtually unaffordable for a fledgling institution and the proposed museum would be a start-up. It would take more than $100 million to acquire the building, and hundreds of millions more to operate it. And while one reasonably could expect that a new museum of architecture would attract a ready supply of patrons among developers, contractors, building suppliers and architects themselves, all have inherent conflicts of interest. The institution would have trouble coming across as much more than a promotional vehicle for vested commercial interests. (It’s noteworthy that existing museums of architecture tend to be government-funded or supported by individuals independent of the commercial sphere of architecture.)

In other words, the Breuer building is not going to become a New York Museum of Architecture anytime soon.

A Museum of Photography for Museum Mile

I have a better idea: the Whitney building would make an ideal museum of photography. And coincidentally, the city’s existing museum in that field, the International Center of Photography, is looking for a new building. Its current lease on the lower floors of 1133 Avenue of the Americas at West 43rd Street runs out in 2013. Honorary trustee Douglas Durst, whose company owns that tower, has charged ICP minimal rent, but sources tell me that the option to renew will be at market rates. The institution has been searching Manhattan for a larger new facility or a place to build one. The plan is to combine the gallery and the ICP school under one roof — the school currently operates across the avenue in the basement of the Grace Building — and there is no better facility in New York than the Breuer building to serve this purpose.

ICP belongs on Museum Mile where visitors would expect to find a photography museum. Indeed, the move would be a return to its roots: the institution began in 1974 in a brownstone on East 94th Street at Fifth Avenue, and moved in 2000 to Avenue of the Americas. Now a more mature entity, it should return to the museum district where its programs would so sensibly augment the offerings of neighboring institutions. ICP has a track record of organizing and mounting significant and meritorious exhibitions. And it has a growing permanent collection of more than 100,000 items with no room for its ongoing display.

The Breuer building would roughly quadruple ICP’s current 17,000 square feet; the Whitney has 32,000 square feet of exhibition space and more than that area for office, storage and other functions. The scale of the galleries and ceiling heights, deemed inadequate to the Whitney’s contemporary-art needs, are ideally suited for the display of photographs, which tend to correspond in scale to paintings, drawings and prints. On the rare occasions when the main galleries have been committed to photography exhibitions they have proven a superb setting; remember how comfortably and handsomely they contained the Eggleston show a couple of years ago. And there is ample room in which to house the school.

Several sources tell me that ICP has discussed the Breuer building with the Whitney, but ICP officials decline to provide details. All they say is that they continue to explore site options. But they are not going to find a more ideal site than the Breuer building (the very greyness of its stone is resonant of the photographic medium). And the move is an ideal solution not only for ICP, but for the Whitney, the City and the public, as well. The main barrier would likely be cost.

It is not clear that the Whitney is willing to sell, but even a long-term lease would strain ICP, which would have to fund conversion costs in addition to rent. The project would require a capital campaign of a scale far beyond any previous financial challenge that its board has faced. But if the making the Breuer building into a new home for ICP is even a remote possibility, the City should invest heavily in promoting dialogue between the institutions, and in subsidizing the relocation. The move would fix another jewel in the City’s cultural crown and insure stability for a key site on Madison Avenue. The City should use its political power and its cultural facilities capital budget to make this happen.

Jason Edward Kaufman

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Corcoran Hires Outside Consultants to Shape its Identity

The struggling institution is selling property and seeking a new vision for its future.

The Corcoran Gallery in Washington, DC.

The Corcoran Gallery in Washington, DC.

WASHINGTON, D.C.  The financially precarious Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., has retained an outside consultant group to determine how the institution can continue to survive, and whether its operation should remain linked to that of the Corcoran College of Art + Design. The gallery and college also plan to lease their adjacent parking lot to a local developer, who will erect an eight-story office building on the site, which was once slated for a Frank Gehry-designed expansion to the Corcoran. In a recent telephone interview, the Corcoran’s director and president, Fred Bollerer, said that the deal – which requires permits from city agencies to proceed — will reap around $1 million per year in rent, but will not provide more space for the institution.

While Bollerer declined to identify the developer until a deal is signed, he said that the Corcoran has hired Toronto-based consultants Lord Cultural Resources to develop ideas for the institution’s future. The college has been growing, but the museum operation is “unsustainable,” he says, adding that while there is no plan to divest the collection it is not clear what form the museum will take in the future.

Bollerer, a former banker and consultant to nonprofits, has been involved with the Corcoran for several years, first as an outside consultant, then as COO, and finally as director and president. (He replaced Paul Greenhalgh, who resigned in May 2010.) Bollerer has no fine-arts background, but was asked to fill the director role while the institution undertook a strategic self-reassessment. His contract is for two years, ending in June of 2012, he says.

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

“The reason I was asked” to take the job, he explains, “is that we had decided as a board to begin to look at what the Corcoran would be 25 years from now, and what it would take to get that done. We wanted a really fresh look at the organization, not as a museum and a college, but as a center for excellence and learning and a pretty spectacular collection, and how those could be rewoven into something that might end up being a college and a museum or it might not be. It might be something else.”

The trustees opted to bring in the well-known nonprofit strategists Barry and Gail Lord, whose clients have ranged from small organizations to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Tourism and Development Investment Corporation of Abu Dhabi.

Bollerer declines to say what the Corcoran is paying Lord, but says that the initial one-year contract covers a four-phase process that will include “research and analysis, and throwing out a bunch of preliminary concepts,” together with a feasibility study, an examination of the conceptual scheme, and finally implementation to commence at the end of 2011.

The assignment is to consider how to reconfigure the Corcoran’s assets into “something that will be relevant 25 years from now,” says Bollerer. His outlook suggests that he favors the self-sustaining college over the deficit-plagued museum, and he hints at their possible increased independence. “I’m not so sure that a museum that struggles to cover its expenses annually and a college that’s doing very well and growing very nicely but is basically a separate organization today can survive in that form,” he says. “Now, I’m not so sure that they can’t, but the idea here is to have these people come in and take us through the exercise of trying to figure that out.”

Lord will help also to shape the job description of a director who can lead the reformed Corcoran. Bollerer says that ideally the new leader would be in place by September 2011, in time for the start of the school year. (The college also is without a leader; interim president Kirk Pillow is leaving to become provost of the University of the Arts in Philadelphia.)

Deficit-plagued museum “stable at an unsustainable long-term level.”

Laying out the Corcoran’s finances, Bollerer says its annual operating budget has hovered around $24 million for the last three years, with around 55 percent going to the college and the balance for the museum. The endowment is less than $23 million, “which obviously is not nearly enough,” he says, and the institution anticipates running a $3 million deficit for the fiscal year ending June 30. On a brighter note, Bollerer claims to have reduced bank debt from $14 million — the amount when he arrived — to around $4 million, most of that financing for renovation of the Corcoran College facility in Georgetown.

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

But the Corcoran gallery’s future remains in the balance. The former director, Greenhalgh, who left to head the Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts at the University of East Anglia in England, oversaw a sensible and attractive reinstallation of the collection, restored the building, reopened disused galleries, and mounted worthwhile exhibitions. But he ran deficits, a problem that in combination with the Corcoran’s other chronic affliction — a weak and ungenerous board of trustees — can be catastrophic. Witness the near fatality of Los Angeles’s MOCA.

“The museum performance is stable,” says Bollerer, “at an unsustainable long-term level. You can’t continue to run a museum at the deficit we have, which is obviously one of the reasons we’re going through this planning process now.”

Bollerer says he has no intention to dispense of the Corcoran’s holdings of American and European painting and sculpture, decorative arts, works on paper, and photography. But he is interested in exploring “how to use our collection in redefining how we address the educational arena, to look at education not just as the college,” he says. “What I’ve said to Barry Lord is I want to look at it from kindergarten through dementia. How do we use our collection to expand it to become much more community-relevant in the education arena?”

But in any event, the Corcoran remains in tenuous financial standing. The 2008 market crash led not only to layoffs and trimmed programs but to a sell-off of real estate. First came the sale of a disused public school building in Southwest Washington where the Corcoran had planned to expand the college. It was acquired from the city for $6.2 million in 2006, and when development deals foundered the Corcoran unloaded it to collectors Don and Mera Rubell, and the developer Telesis, for $6.5 million. That amount was well below the assessed value of the property, but roughly at market value, according to Bollerer. The Rubells and Telesis plan to create a museum, hotel, and retail space. (The Corcoran subsequently — and controversially — presented a traveling exhibition of works from the Rubell collection.)

The Corcoran also tried to sell its college building in Georgetown, but withdrew when developer Eastbanc failed to make a nonrefundable deposit, says Bollerer. He says that the Corcoran now plans to retain the property, which may become a site for future expansion of the college.

Model of abandoned Frank Gehry plan.

Model of expansion plan designed by Frank Gehry, a project abandoned by the board of trustees.

Now comes the pending lease that will enable a developer to erect a 120,000-square-foot tower next door. “We wouldn’t sell the property,” says Bollerer. “We would do it as a ground lease because I’d like to have the revenue,” he says, pegging the income as “a little over a million a year” at the outset, with the lease reevaluated after ten years. The Corcoran will have access to some underground parking for events, but will forfeit the option of expanding on site.

Developer's tower proposed for the site.

Developer's proposed glass tower for the site.

It is a sorry state of affairs when a once distinguished institution must resort to outside consultants to define its identity. But, at this point, that may be just what the Corcoran needs. The institution has never fully regained its footing since 2005 when the board canceled its widely anticipated Gehry-designed expansion for the site that is now to become an office building. Board dissension led to the departure of then-director David Levy and trustee and AOL tycoon Robert Pittman, among many others. By the time Greenhalgh was hired in 2006 the board was further decimated, and a round-robin of chairmen has since failed to generate the sense of shared purpose and ownership that can attract talented leaders capable of planning and completing important projects.

The current board, chaired by Harry Hopper, consists of nine voting members and several non-voting members. (Bollerer says the federal charter establishing the museum limits voting members to nine, and he is seeking legal advice on expanding that number.) Each contributes a minimum of $25,000 per year — which is not enough to support a major cultural organization. If the identity of the museum and college remain ambiguous, the Corcoran will never assemble a powerful and committed board. That is why the current strategic planning process will be a crucial test for the Corcoran, and for Lord Cultural Resources, as well.

Jason Edward Kaufman

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

This article first appeared on December 27, 2011 at Artinfo.com.

Metropolitan Museum Should Expand under Fifth Avenue Plaza

Fifth Avenue plaza in front of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Fifth Avenue plaza in front of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Recent reports on The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s plans to renovate the plaza in front of its building neglect to mention what happened last time the museum intended to overhaul that space: wealthy neighbors across Fifth Avenue sued the museum saying they would not stand for construction disrupting their lives and allegedly driving down property values.

In 2004 State Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit on a statute-of-limitations technicality, but cautioned that an appeal based on the merits of the complaint stood a good chance of success. The museum withdrew its plans for the plaza construction.

The initial idea in 2000 had been to add 100,000 square feet of underground space for storage and other purposes. The museum’s president, Emily Rafferty, tells me that financial considerations after September 11, 2001 contributed to the decision to scale back the plan, and that Con Ed installations would make the excavation complex. But the threat of confrontation with the powerful Fifth Avenue neighbors surely played a part in curtailing the Met’s ambitions.

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Which is a shame, because the underground expansion was a good idea. Space is a dire problem for the Met, which abides by zoning regulations that forbid increasing its footprint; the only ways to expand on-site are by reconfiguring existing space, adding onto the roof, or digging underground. (The ongoing overhaul of the American Wing includes underground expansion, and the future makeover of the Wallace Wing likely will, as well.) The renovation of the Fifth Avenue plaza is a rare opportunity for the Met to capture much needed space, but spokesman Harold Holzer says, “We are not making plans to build beneath the plaza.”

But perhaps Mr. Holzer, who earlier in his career worked on political campaigns, is making a Clintonesque statement that hinges on the verb “to be.” That is, the Met is not at this moment making plans to excavate, which is not to say that such plans could not arise in the course of designing the project. When I asked Ms. Rafferty if the likelihood of opposition from the neighbors was a factor in deciding not to excavate, she said, “Your question is premature as there are no specific plans yet.”

The Met has hired Philadelphia- and Los Angeles-based landscape architects OLIN to create a design. Ms. Rafferty says an initial scheme will be ready in about a year, with the project targeted for completion within around four years. “Any design that we finalize will be respectful of the integrity of the building and the community,” says Ms. Rafferty. And to become final, any design must pass review by city zoning, planning, landmarks and community boards.

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

The museum already appeared before Community Board 8 to let its members know about the planned renovation.  “We hold regular meetings with our neighbors and will continue to do so,” says Ms. Rafferty, noting that the museum’s chief government affairs officer, Tom Schuler, oversees the outreach.  As yet there has been no objection, but then, no design has been proposed. But who knows how the neighbors will respond? Queries emailed to Pat Nicholson, leader of the coalition whose lawsuit scuttled the earlier project, went unanswered.

Ms. Rafferty says, “In the event that the neighbors express concerns, we will certainly address them…I’d like to think that we can work to come to a resolution if they do have comments. We fully respect our neighbors and hope they will agree that whatever plan we develop will provide a marvelous way to enter the museum and will respect our surroundings.”

The museum recently cleaned the facade, renovated the great stairs and repaired the existing fountains, but the new initiative promises even greater aesthetic and functional enhancement, not least the crowd-dispersing improvement of access through street-level entrances. Let’s hope that the neighbors will consider not only their own short-term concerns, but also the long-term needs of the Metropolitan and the city whose residents and visitors it serves.

Jason Edward Kaufman

http://jasonkaufman.info

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Frida Kahlo Controversy Calls into Question the Authenticity of the Artist’s Work

Portrait of Frida Kahlo from Noyola Collection

Portrait of Frida Kahlo from Noyola Collection, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico.

Frida Kahlo left no autobiography, and the 80 or so letters and a single diary published in the 1990s have not begun to slake the thirst for details and relics of her personal life. Kahlo experts have witnessed an increase in the number of questionable works, if not outright fakes, circulating on the secondary market but nothing quite like the massive cache that emerged last year in Mexico. Even as its authenticity was disputed, the collection was enshrined in a book by Princeton Architectural Press. The Mexican government is undertaking an inquiry.

Click here to read the complete article about the Frida Kahlo controversy.*

*This article is from IFAR Journal, Volume 11, nos. 3&4, 2010, published by the International Foundation for Art Research and may not be reproduced/distributed elsewhere without IFAR’s permission.

**Sign up here for free Jason Kaufman IN VIEW culture bulletins.**

Jason Edward Kaufman
http://jasonkaufman.info