In the Air
Art News & Gossip

In the Air – Art+Auction's Gossip Column

Manifesta 10 Sticking With Russian Location Despite Gay Rights Supporters’ Petition

Pin It


Earlier this month a petition was launched calling on the organizers of Manifesta 10, which is slated to open in June 2014 at St. Petersburg’s State Hermitage Museum, to relocate the roving biennial to a city outside Russia in protest of the country’s anti-gay laws. Today the exhibition’s organizers responded to that call (see full statement below), stating that the exhibition will not relocate, but will serve as an examination of the Russian society that has emerged in the quarter-century since the end of the Cold War.

The Manifesta statement reads:

In 2012 the Manifesta Foundation selected the State Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg, Russian Federation as host of Manifesta 10. Since announcing the State Hermitage Museum as host institution, the Russian parliament has adopted a federal law banning the ‘propaganda of non-­‐traditional sexual relationships’ accessible by minors. The legislation has received extensive exposure around the world and subsequently there have been calls to boycott, cancel or relocate international cultural and social events planned within Russia.

In response to those who have expressed deep concerns regarding the situation of LGBT people in Russia and any violations of their human rights, we share your concerns. What is clear is that progressive, contemporary culture in Russia is contested and, as ideas continue to be exchanged across borders, we believe it is vital to play an active role in this dialogue. Manifesta was initiated as a discursive, adaptable artistic entity in response to the new social, cultural and political realities that emerged in the aftermath of the Cold War. Manifesta 10 will investigate these 25 years of changing realities and experiences as they have transformed within this new global world order.

The Manifesta Foundation was founded on principals of engagement, dialogue, debate and education. The nomadic character of Manifesta aims to establish closer dialogue between cultures within the broader, international fields of contemporary art, theory and politics in a changing society and in possibly contested areas. On principle Manifesta cannot and should not only perform in the ‘safe haven’ of the West or former West. This inevitably involves dialogue with those with whom we may disagree.

Viktor Misiano, Chair of the Manifesta Foundation says:
“Within Russia Manifesta 10 has been welcomed by many individuals who recognise that cancelling or postponing it will be a loss, not only for communities seeking change, but also for developing a progressive contemporary culture as a whole. We are conscious of the political climate and the significant conservative shift taking place in Russia, of which this issue is but one example. It is also helpful to know that the leading LGBT organizations in Russia do not support a boycott of the Olympics or other events. They know engagement is important.”

St Petersburg-­‐based LGBT organization Coming Out states:
“We at Coming Out are very grateful for any kind of international support to LGBT citizens in Russia as it is important that people do not feel further isolated in the current climate of repressions, homophobic aggression, and intimidation. We understand the call for a boycott of the Olympics. But we truly believe it is important to keep all channels open and enable all possible communications to challenge human rights violations at every opportunity, whether they are cultural or sporting events, business opportunities or political campaigns.”

Sjeng Scheijen, Artistic Director of the Russian/Dutch bi-­lateral year, says:
“The cultural world in Russia is one of the places where an alternative, independent intellectual life takes place. Manifesta 10 is supported in Russia by a spirited forefront of independent, critical, internationally oriented artists and intellectuals. They have a great need for a platform for meeting and exchange, and seek international models for their own cultural events. They eagerly look forward to the arrival of Manifesta.”

Manifesta Founder and Director, Hedwig Fijen said today:
“Manifesta is an advocate of having mutual respect for any person regardless of their sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, disability, age or sexual orientation. Manifesta Foundation endorses the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the European Convention for Human Rights, Council of Europe Recommendations and other decrees by international organizations, of which Russia is a member. Manifesta aims to engage in a genuine dialogue with the larger artistic and general communities in St Petersburg and the Russian federation. To withdraw would mean to ignore the voices of our contemporaries and emerging generations in Russia. In developing this project in Russia we have listened to representatives of the Russian LGBT communities and we have overwhelmingly heard that Manifesta’s presence is both welcomed and necessary. We do not believe isolating Russia is the right direction to take, especially as it deprives younger people of access to a broader scope of voices and points of view.”

Manifesta 10 will open in St. Petersburg in June 2014; The petition calling for its relocation has been signed by over 1,750 people as of this writing, and needs fewer than 750 more to reach its goal.

— Benjamin Sutton

(Photo: The State Hermitage Museum’s General Staff Building. Via Manifesta/Facebook.)

Tags: , , , , ,

Pin It


  1. On-going abuse and calls from the international art community to cancel, postpone or move the 10th anniversary edition of Manifesta have been ignored. The rapes, torture, violent assaults and restrictions of employment opportunities of the LGBT community who are citizens and resident in Russian mean nothing. The show must go on and it is clear that human rights abuse are only an annoyance.

    What is most interesting about the response is the clear message that the Manifesta organisers are so invested in the delivery that they listen only to the voice that tells them what they want to hear. Morals, ethics, and simple concern for human rights are subservient to the greater cause of art as Manifesta sees it. This form of ethical bankruptcy means that Manifesta have created their own demise in terms of credibility. No doubts they will look back at this time of great validation for their own naive and overly simplistic view of the world.

    So, Manifesta, as you now prepare for your collaboration and affirmation of the human rights abuses taking place in Russian, remember the following:

    • A 26 year old lies dead after being anally raped by beer bottles all because he was gay
    • A transgendered woman was assaulted in the most vicious manner which was proudly filmed and broadcast by her assailants because they know that they can get away with it in Russia
    • A mother is emigrating to the USA because her children are in danger of being taken away from her just because she is a lesbian
    • A journalist was removed from his job because he came out as gay on air
    • Posters asking people to report their neighbours who they think are gay
    • A bridegroom was beaten so badly that his broken jaw had to be wired so that he could make it to his wedding day… because he acted “in an extravagant manner”

    There are more, and so the organisers sit with their blood on their hands… because St Petersburg has literally bought the brand that is Manifesta. Any artist who has any form of conscience about how fellow human beings are being treated should now consider strongly boycotting not only Manifesta St Petersburg, but also all future Manifestas. The recent petition showed 1768 signatures questioning Manifesta and the error in judgement of continuing to be hosted by St Petersburg… only 389 supported it staying. But, Manifesta knows best.

    The visual arts will not stand by while the reputations of the small few are built on the blood of the victims of human rights abuse. No doubts we will see yet more pictures of Hedwig Fijen, Director of Manifesta, as she continues to be entertained, wined and dined by the “St Petersburg Cossacks” – One has to ask how can they sleep at night?

  2. by Tom in Lazybrook

    It should be moved unless LGBT persons may attend and present at the event. And by present and attend, that means to present and attend as themselves (meaning carrying rainbow flags and criticizing publically Putin/Kiril if they so choose).

    Right now in Russia LGBT persons have no artistic or personal freedom. None. The right to go to a Gay bar in St Petersburg (which may involve violence by the cops, as happened last year) is not really much of a right.

    How can you hold an artistic event where it is against the law for artistic expression to exist?

    The Russian LGBT film festival has been attacked (while the police stood by and did nothing) in Novisibirsk last year). Russian artists have had their events cancelled and have felt the need to flee the country simply for criticizing Putin through art (yesterday).

    There cannot be an exchange of ideas to promote understanding so long as the hosts are banning the exchange of ideas. Move the event, cancel it, or lose all credibility.

  3. Shame Shame Shame

  4. by Steven Evans

    Manifesta is sending the message that it supports human rights abuses and that LGTBQ artists and related content are of no consequence. This is simply unacceptable for an international cultural organization in the twenty-first century.

    Manifesta no longer has credibility and should undertake its own dissolution purposefully, although at this point the ultimate future of the organization is a fait accompli.

  5. by Terry R Myers

    From the statement: “In response to those who have expressed deep concerns regarding the situation of LGBT people in Russia and any violations of their human rights, we share your concerns.” My response to all of you, the organizers of Manifesta 10, is that the shameful doublespeak of your statement suggests otherwise. How exactly do you anticipate a LGTBQ artist being able to participate? The absolute weakness of your statement, in which you make the oh-so-bold claim to “disagree” with acts of violence, murder, etc., provides zero confidence, and is, in the end, despicable.

Add a Comment