’Tis the season for art industry bashing. On the heels of Sarah Thornton’s public resignation from art market reporting and Dave Hickey’s critique of art criticism, artist/critic Jacob Willer proclaims that contemporary isn’t cool anymore. His essay, “How Contemporary Art Lost Its Glamour,” published in the November issue of British art and culture magazine Standpoint, offers Damien Hirst’s and Maurizio Cattelan’s critically panned retrospectives, public opprobrium towards Anish Kapoor’s ArcelorMittal Orbit, Charles Saatchi knocking art collecting as “the sport of the Eurotrashy, Hedge-fundy, Hamptonites,” and Tracey Emin’s appointment as a drawing professor at the Royal Academy as evidence of contemporary art’s thinning relevance.
“Contemporary art has finally become uncool,” Willer posits, “Because of money. Money has become uncool.” As other writers have suggested, the current economically divisive, post-Occupy climate makes slick, market-centric contemporary art appear woefully out of touch and obsolete. And, as Willer puts it, “the pointlessly rich can no longer excuse their pointlessness by sponsoring the most extravagantly pointless art — they only draw attention to it.” Read the full article here, or see below for a digest of Willer’s most devastating zingers:
On mega-collector Charles Saatchi:
“Saatchi, the man who made the reputations of almost all the artists now deemed most offensive, with an adman’s snigger, tries to position himself away from the art of the 1 per cent. He sides with the masses, of course, to whom he has always sidled for his sell … In that public mood he must have noticed the significant new attitude. Contemporary art’s old allure is gone. Since the art is not cool, the advertiser is hedging. He declares himself out before the others — the only way to stay cool.”
On reformed bad girl artist Tracey Emin:
“Meanwhile, Tracey Emin has accepted the appointment of Professor of Drawing at the Royal Academy. The appointment really says more about that institution than about Emin, but it tells us that Emin, too, is anxious to position herself with craft and tradition, to move away from what was fashionable. Even the artists, now in desperate disguise, are jumping from the procession and trying to join the murmuring crowd. They have heard the music, and shivered. “
On Kapoor’s Tower:
“It may well look hideous, but it is doubly hideous for what it is overtly signifying. It is just a toy version of Tatlin’s Tower, the proposed headquarters for the Comintern in Petrograd (now St. Petersburg). Everyone on the academic side of the art world will recognise it, and smirk … A reverential tribute to modernist orthodoxy, in its mode of address to the art world, Kapoor’s tower harks back to times before Hirst. It begs for credibility, and sophisticated money, by appealing to sentimentality over subversive politics. Before the super-rich had found an art shiny and shallow enough to help them love their bare reflection, for near on a century they had been buying into an art which, as a polished incarnation of the revolutionary spirit, agreeably distorted their reflection.”
On Coolness-as-Institution:
“Without cool, contemporary art may be devastated. A contributor to Vice magazine, a young person’s guide to correctly subversive fashions, inadvertently showed how art is failing. “You know what? I’m sick of pretending. I went to art school, wrote a dissertation called ‘The Elevation of Art Through Commerce: An Analysis of Charles Saatchi’s Approach to the Machinery of Art Production Using Pierre Bourdieu’s Theories of Distinction’, have attended art openings at least once a month for the last five years, even fucking purchased pieces of it, but after attending the opening of the new Tracey Emin retrospective at the Hayward Gallery, I’m finally ready to come out and say it: I just don’t think I ‘get’ art.” The critic is in earnest, but he is not wholly honest with himself. He “got” art when it was cool; he does not ‘get’ art when it is uncool. He “got” art because it was cool. And he really got it, as we can see from his dissertation title … He is “finally ready to come out and say it”, now, because this is just the moment a fashionable person would say it — the moment art lost its cool.”
— Chloe Wyma
(Damien Hirst with his work, “The physical impossibility of Death in the mind of someone living.”)
Tags: Anish Kapoor, Charles Saatchi, Damien Hirst, Jacob Willer, Standpoint



Tags:
Maybe art can just get back to being about what the artist does, instead of what the collector does.
Modern art is a bad joke that the patrons of such art don’t get. The common people, the rabble, the peons, the hoi-polloi, laugh at the art, but laugh even harder at those who buy it. Are clowns cool? They are many things – abrasive, colorful, ridiculous, offensive, much like modern art – but one thing they aren’t is cool. The Bozos who keep patronizing flash-in-the-pan novelty acts and support the Barnum circus sideshows known as modern art galleries are losing their street cred, no matter how much bad art they buy. Maybe it’s time they realize they’ve been “Barnumed” and direct their dollars at artists who have the talent and skill to delineate, celebrate and transfigure the world around us. Helping making the world beautiful with sculpture and art, rather than trying to influence public tastes by buying garbage, is a much better investment. AND is at least 20% cooler.
f you think Hirst, Cattelan, Kapooor or Emin are contemporary you are off your shit ,
how about art that has some HEAT?
so who was the brash little boy who noticed first?
I would not trash contemporary art. Perhaps if there were less price manipulators and self indulged collectors, artists like Hirst would possibly think of producing something relevant versus garbage that they produce.
Errrrr… Who didn’t see this coming, like, from afar?
Most conterporary art is a question of ‘The Emporer’s New Clothes’ to those who produce, pontificate and sell the irrelevant rubbish. More fool them the buyers, wonder how they will be viewed centuries on?
Always liked Braque’s fish paintings myself. Sharks in tanks not so much. Not remotely interested in mumbo-jumbo about what is or isn’t art. Virtuosity is all that interests me. Even had it myself in the 70’s for a brief while. Nice while it lasted. Great artists possess it for longer, Bonnard, Matisse, Monet … People can see who’s got it and who hasn’t. Hot air and hype eventually dissipate.
Duh. And this isnt Modern art, it is its very opposite and enemy, fashion for the tacky nouveau riche. Contempt art.
Few great artists have ever graduate from a school of standardized mediocrity, an art academy. Do away with looking only at daycare center grads and look for the highest common denominator of mankind through teh visual language, and you just might find creative art again. its here, get off yer aszes and out of tiny moldy money minded Manhattan.