In the Air
Art News & Gossip

In the Air – Art+Auction's Gossip Column

Smithsonian Responds to Censorship Critics By Basically Creating David Wojnarowicz.com

Pin It

UPDATE: Since publishing this story, IN THE AIR has learned that there was a reason this move by the Smithsonian seemed odd. In short, we got pranked. You got us, you puckish mystery scoundrel(s)! And hats off to you: the fake National Portrait Gallery Web site was professionally done, and the press release too. (Though we really should have noticed the smiley faces.) People for the American Way got suckered as well, apparently. Anyway, read on. We’d take the post down but it’s just too funny.

After outraging the art world, several of its funders, and a giant chunk of its constituency with its fatal decision to remove David Wojnarowicz’s “Fire in My Belly” from the National Portrait Gallery’s “Hide/Seek” show, the Smithsonian has chosen to respond to its critics in a dramatic, and rather odd, fashion: instead of returning the work to the exhibition, the institution has turned the National Portrait Gallery’s Web site into an all-Wojnarowicz-all-the-time resource center, complete with a “special online-only screening” of the original 13-minute long version of “Fire in My Belly.”

Occupying the top of the site’s home page, the embedded video is accompanied by text explaining that it “expresses the suffering, marginalization and physical decay of those afflicted with AIDS,” with the scene featuring ants crawling over a crucifix — the imagery the right wing used as the pretext for its attack on the gay-themed show — squarely “in the tradition of art that uses such imagery to universalize human suffering.” This is followed by a disclaimer: “Please be warned that the video may be considered graphic or offensive to some viewers.”

Then, below the video, is a set of links to “learn more about David Wojnarowicz,” references to art works and performances created in protest of the censorship, and a rather comprehensive catalogue of the media coverage of the controversy. Included here are links to several of ARTINFO’s stories on the topic, including one revealing National Portrait Galery director Martin Sullivan’s leaked contrite memo about the incident and a report on the massive protest march on the Smithsonian’s Cooper-Hewitt museum in New York, along with some of ARTINFO blogger Tyler Green’s excellent coverage.

However, in a press release issued Friday night (a great time to bury news, incidentally), the Smithsonian announced that it will not accede to calls to return Wojnarowicz’s artwork to the exhibition. Smithsonian Secretary G. Wayne Clough (read about his background here), Sullivan, and the institution’s “Secretary for History, Art, and Culture” (apparently Richard Kurin, usually referred to as the under secretary) “have taken great time to consider the requests of both supporters and opponents of the work’s display, and feel this compromise is fair,” according to the release.

Neither the Web site nor the press release address calls for other works to be removed from “Hide/Seek” in protest of the censorship, or the Warhol Foundation’s intention to cut funding to the institution if “Fire in My Belly” is not returned to view (though there is a link to foundation president Joel Wach’s letter demanding the video’s reinstatement).

The Smithsonian’s move to put the video — which is by now widely available elsewhere online, and has been screened since the censorship in other museums across the country — on the Gallery’s Web site is a puzzling gesture this late in the game, and it does nothing to change the fact that right-wing pressure from a tiny faction of Christian fundamentalists and Republican congressmen succeeded in forcing the institution to change its exhibition to suit an ideologically motivated agenda.

Do you agree with the Smithsonian that “this compromise is fair”?

Pin It

Comments

  1. No, I do not agree this is a compromise at all. The work is still removed from the exhibit and that is still censorship. Putting it on the website is a half-hearted effort to address the issue. I hope the Warhol Foundation pulls their funding. It’s a disgrace that these right wing extremists are entertained.

  2. Blacks to the back of the bus, and homosexual art that the Right opposes on the internet only.

    Asinine compromise.

  3. The website you link to (nationalportraitgallery.us) is a FAKE website. As is the press release (notice the smiley face in the Smithsonian logo anyone?). Hello? Can’t you tell the fake from the real thing, even a clever fake?

    The official National Portrait Gallery website is http://www.npg.si.edu

    ArtInfo needs to do a bit more careful research.

  4. I hope this is not funded by taxpayer. I’ve never seen extreme right wing art in tax funded venues yet left wing propaganda is common—the NEA since Obama has requested far left wing “art” propaganda to be funded by the NEA from taxpayer money. I wouldn’t be surprized if Larry Sinclair nudes show up next.

  5. Absolutely pathetic! The Smithsonian has essentially declared itself a hostile witness. The Smithsonian has broken faith with art and the art world. I am afraid the art would must now break faith with the Smithsonian.

    Jerry Saltz

  6. Jerry,

    Let’s meet up for coffee and talk some things over? What are you feeling – Birch maybe? We’d like to co-produce a show for Bravo with you and Bourriaud: America’s Next Top Radicant.

    natportgal@gmail.com

    Best,
    NPG

  7. get “used” to it, about to get worse, let’s call it “the American lament!

  8. The worst fraud of all was mounted shortly afterwards by the FALES LIBRARY
    who denied that the” you tube” work was created by David, when it was,
    with Marvin Taylor, calling David’s work “a mess,” because he himself was not
    privy to the latest and most radical version of the work, edited by david in 1989
    with co-filmmaker marion scemama of semiotext(e) i for the CENTRE GEORGES
    POMPIDOU. The titles on the footage are in French and this was for the benefit of
    the audience, of course. David brought Galas work THIS IS LAW OF THE PLAGUE
    along with him to the editing suite and slapped it on, matching the film to the precise
    timing of her piece from THE 1986 album THE DIVINE PUNISHMENT. Both artists have
    been extensively abused by the Catholic Church and then censured by the Fales Gallery.
    How about that for a laugh?
    Let us not forget to mention little jonathon katz’s baleful soundtrack created for
    the smithsonian showing ( to occlude museum noices). That was so considerate
    of all of these people. A “MESS?” READ OUT MAGAZINE BY TONY PHILLIPS HE KNOWS
    THE ENTIRE STORY.

    READ THE WALL STREET JOURNAL MARCH 3 2010

Add a Comment